The most profitable application in the cryptocurrency world is starting to languish.
From competing with bonk.fun to conducting and completing one of the largest ICOs in cryptocurrency history, pump.fun's financial performance this year, while not as spectacular as last year, has still been quite successful. To date, pump.fun has spent nearly 1 million SOL (approximately $188 million) in transaction fees to buy back 12.227% of the total supply of $PUMP.

However, the continuous and large-scale buybacks failed to improve the price of pump.fun, and it continued to decline. The actions of pump.fun and its co-founder Alon have increasingly drawn market dissatisfaction. Two days ago, Mario Nawfal, a prominent influencer with over 2.6 million followers, publicly criticized pump.fun on his alternate account:

"Even if pump.fun is a for-profit company, their actions are baffling. Solana has been struggling, while they've sold billions of dollars worth of SOL. They completed their $PUMP ICO a few months ago with a promise of airdrops, but haven't delivered, nor have they reinvested in the ecosystem. Even setting aside the ethical considerations of this company doing good, from a purely business perspective, how can they expect the ecosystem that made them successful to continue thriving when they are so indifferent to it?"
This is likely the largest public attack on pump.fun by a KOL we've seen to date. Just hours after this tweet, pump.fun announced a $10,000 community grant to each of its six meme tokens, a move that only added fuel to the fire and was mercilessly mocked by its supporters.

In the comments section below this tweet, there are many similar tweets:
"I'll fuck you."
"That's fucking hilarious."
"You make so much money every day, and then only give $10,000 to these Meme coin users who work so hard to build your ecosystem? What can $10,000 do?"
In August of this year, when Pump.fun faced a strong challenge from Bonk.fun, they launched the Glass Full Foundation, spending approximately $1.7 million to purchase some well-performing meme coins within their ecosystem. However, since then, Pump.fun has not invested any real money in meme coins within its ecosystem. About two weeks ago, $neet, the "last survivor" in the Glass Full Foundation's portfolio, fell below the price Pump.fun purchased it at, resulting in a total loss of approximately $1.37 million for the Glass Full Foundation's holdings.

Players who steadfastly sided with pump.fun during the pump.fun vs. bonk.fun battle, and those who hoped pump.fun could shoulder the responsibility of revitalizing the meme market, are understandably disappointed. They wanted pump.fun to focus on building its own ecosystem, instead of jumping from one thing to another—CCM (the live streaming token) and then ICM—ultimately creating a mess.
Despite numerous buybacks, the sluggish price of $PUMP has led to increasing skepticism among players due to their growing disillusionment and despair.

How do you explain why $PUMP, despite repurchasing over 10%, is still trading below its IPO price?
In this situation, the official Twitter accounts of pump.fun and its co-founder Alon inexplicably fell into a period of silence for about 10 days, without posting a single tweet. They didn't even mention the last major pump.fun update, "Mayhem Mode."
Incidentally, "Mayhem Mode" was also an update that was heavily criticized by players. Given the sluggish Solana meme market, the "Mayhem Mode's" lowered token graduation requirements and the mechanism of randomly purchasing tokens for that mode through transaction fees were seen as pump.fun exploiting the market.
The inexplicable silence prompted even the AI aixbt to jump out and fire at pump.fun:

"pump.fun has collected $300 million in fees, but its token graduation rate is currently only 0.7%. There are 12,610 launches per day, with 98 successful. The platform profits from 99.3% of failed token launches. The team suddenly disappeared 13 days ago, during their highest-volume week ever. Their buybacks are allegedly just money laundering, and the product itself is a value-squeezing machine."
Subsequently, a tweet from Lookonchain sparked rumors in the market that "pump.fun has run away with the money":

"It appears that pump.fun has cashed out at least $436.5 million since October 15th."
This tweet finally brought pump.fun back to life. Sapijiju, co-founder of pump.fun, tweeted that Lookonchain's tweet was completely untrue, and that pump.fun did not cash out any funds, but simply transferred the funds raised in the ICO to different wallets so that the company could use these funds to invest in business development.

This explanation is clearly weak. Pump.fun has only disclosed acquisitions of Kolscan and Padre; the former is a tool for tracking KOL trading profits and losses, and the latter is a trading platform. When announcing the acquisition of Padre, Pump.fun also announced that Padre tokens would no longer be used on the platform and that there were no further plans for the future.
Imagine a Web2 company being acquired, and shareholders, barely two minutes into their celebration, are informed that all their shares are forfeited. This was the cold-blooded tragedy that unfolded that night; those who didn't carefully read the end of the tweet thread were left hanging, while the original $PADRE holders had nowhere to turn for help.

Holding a product's token -> Finally seeing it acquired by a major industry company -> Instantly doubling in value, feeling great -> Discovering the acquiring company says the token is now useless and has no future plans -> Plunging out.
Finally, although the rumors of pump.fun's collapse are currently unfounded panic, and pump.fun has responded, they represent a concentrated expression of market dissatisfaction. If pump.fun is merely a shrewd company, but completely disregards human nature in its calculations, it cannot be called a truly astute strategist.
Of course, it's also possible they've already made enough money and don't care anymore. After all, the airdrop, which was tweeted as "coming soon" on July 9th, hasn't shown any sign of arriving yet. Alon said Q4 would be a glorious quarter, but it turned out to be a cold and messy affair. The lack of transparency in communication and the joke-like community incentives have only increased player resentment.
How can "Trench" say "I love you," pump.fun?
- 核心观点:pump.fun因失信与不作为引发市场强烈不满。
- 关键要素:
- 花费1.88亿美元回购代币,币价仍持续破发。
- 未兑现空投承诺,生态投资严重不足。
- 大额资金转移引跑路猜测,回应苍白。
- 市场影响:严重损害平台信誉,加剧市场信任危机。
- 时效性标注:短期影响


