Risk Warning: Beware of illegal fundraising in the name of 'virtual currency' and 'blockchain'. — Five departments including the Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission
Information
Discover
Search
Login
简中
繁中
English
日本語
한국어
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
BTC
ETH
HTX
SOL
BNB
View Market
Silvergate executive: 'Sudden regulatory shift' led to bank's closure amid bankruptcy filing
2024-09-23 02:36
Odaily News In a new bankruptcy filing, Elaine Hetrick, CEO of Silvergate Capital Corporation, the company responsible for liquidating crypto-friendly bank Silvergate Bank Holdings, said that despite the shrinking cryptocurrency industry and rising interest rates, the bank "has stabilized, is able to meet regulatory capital requirements, and is well positioned to continue serving those customers who have retained their deposits." However, in 2023, "an abrupt regulatory shift" from agencies such as the Federal Reserve, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) "made it clear that, at least in the first quarter of 2023, these agencies would no longer tolerate banks with a large concentration of digital asset customers, ultimately preventing Silvergate Bank from continuing its digital asset-focused business model." Hetrick's statement in the bankruptcy filing provides a timeline that led to Silvergate Bank's closure on March 8, 2023, two days before Silicon Valley Bank closed and four days before Signature Bank was taken over by regulators. Hetrick said that serving crypto clients helped the relatively small bank grow in size, “…increasing its deposits from $1.8 billion at the end of 2019 to approximately $14.3 billion at the end of 2021,” with crypto clients representing “substantially all” of the bank’s non-interest bearing deposits (i.e., checking accounts) through the end of 2021 and the first half of 2022. The filing also said that “Silvergate’s consolidated business reported a net loss of $948.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to net income of $75.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, primarily due to losses on the sale of long-term securities resulting from rising interest rates,” but as the bank scaled back to continue operating, it “still held assets worth more than deposits and met regulatory capital requirements at the beginning of 2023.” However, in early 2023, increasing attention from regulators led to an “inflection point” in the bank’s business model. Notably, federal banking agencies including the Federal Reserve, FDIC, and OCC issued two statements stating that they have "serious safety and soundness concerns" about business models that are heavily exposed to the crypto industry and the liquidity risks faced by banks that primarily serve crypto-related customers. (The Block)