BTC
ETH
HTX
SOL
BNB
ดูตลาด
简中
繁中
English
日本語
한국어
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt

Trump's Rhetoric Reversals: The So-Called "Deal on the Horizon" is Just a Smokescreen of War

区块律动BlockBeats
特邀专栏作者
2026-06-11 11:00
บทความนี้มีประมาณ 3505 คำ การอ่านทั้งหมดใช้เวลาประมาณ 6 นาที
Calling for Negotiations While Bombing Iran Again
สรุปโดย AI
ขยาย
  • Core Thesis: This article criticizes the Trump administration's policy reversal on Iran, arguing that the narrative of a "deal being reached soon" serves as a smokescreen to conceal military escalation. This led to U.S. airstrikes on Iran, triggering retaliation, the continued closure of the Strait of Hormuz, and exposing diplomatic talks as political theater serving the news cycle.
  • Key Elements:
    1. A U.S. Army AH-64 helicopter crashed in the Strait of Hormuz under disputed circumstances (potentially colliding with an Iranian drone). Trump's attitude sharply shifted from "no big deal" to claiming Iran "shot it down," subsequently launching airstrikes.
    2. The U.S. military conducted "self-defense strikes" on 20 targets along Iran's coast, disrupting drinking water supply for 20,000 local residents. Iran retaliated with 21 attacks targeting U.S. bases in Bahrain, Kuwait, and Jordan.
    3. Since the start of the conflict, Trump has made over thirty promises that a deal is "close to being reached" (e.g., "within two to three days"). Each promise has been contradicted by subsequent military actions or facts, revealing the "deal" as political performance.
    4. The so-called "most successful blockade" failed to achieve its core goal of reopening the Strait of Hormuz, leading to rising oil prices and market pressure, with diplomatic posturing being emotionally driven and inconsistent.
    5. The author advises readers to keep a record of statements like "very close" and to expect the opposite outcome, as these have become institutionalized empty promises.

Original Title: "Trust Me, Bro" Is Not A Middle East Policy: Trump Just Bombed Iran Again Over A Helicopter That May Have Flown Into A Drone

Original Author: Dean Blundell

Translation: Peggy, BlockBeats

Editor's Note: This article centers on the US military airstrike launched against targets near the Strait of Hormuz in Iran in the early morning of June 10, Beijing time. Dean Blundell, with a strongly satirical tone, criticizes the Trump administration's policy inconsistencies on the Iran issue: a US Army AH-64 "Apache" helicopter crashed near the Strait of Hormuz; both pilots were rescued. The cause of the incident remains disputed. Trump initially dismissed it as "no big deal," but later on Truth Social characterized it as Iran "shooting down" a US military helicopter, using it as a pretext to strike Iranian coastal air defenses, radar, and ground control facilities.

The article's real critique is not just this military response, but the Trump administration's repeated smokescreen of "a deal is almost done." It claims negotiations are in the "final stage" and an agreement can be signed "within two or three days," while simultaneously escalating military actions and publicly humiliating Iran. The so-called diplomatic negotiation resembles more of a political performance serving a news cycle. Meanwhile, the US military's "proportionate response" further triggers retaliatory Iranian strikes on American regional bases. The Strait of Hormuz remains unsecured, and oil prices and market pressure persist. The author reminds readers that when "being very close" repeatedly replaces real progress, the most rational reaction might not be to believe, but to document it and assume reality is likely the opposite.

Below is the original text:

Let's start with the timeline, because the timeline itself is the core of the entire deception.

Monday evening, a US Army AH-64 "Apache" attack helicopter crashed in the Strait of Hormuz off the coast of Oman. Both pilots survived and were unharmed – they were rescued within two hours by an unmanned vessel. It must be admitted, that was a pretty cool piece of military equipment, and the only part of the whole story that actually functioned correctly.

But here's the part Trump won't put in his all-caps social media posts: a US official told AP that the "Apache" crashed after colliding with an Iranian drone, and it remains unclear whether the collision was intentional. Trump himself told the Wall Street Journal the whole thing was "no big deal" and "the pilots are okay."

So, keep this in mind first: No big deal. Pilots are okay. Cause is under investigation. Maybe just an accident.

Tuesday morning, the same person, a different mood. He went back on Truth Social and wrote: "I have just received notification from our great military that, last night, Iran shot down one of our highly advanced Apache helicopters while it was patrolling over the Strait of Hormuz... The United States must respond to this attack. Thank you for your attention to this matter!"

From "no big deal" to "must respond," just one news cycle apart. This person contradicted his own account in less than 24 hours, and we seem expected to nod along as if it's some kind of statecraft.

Late Tuesday night into early Wednesday, US Central Command began striking targets along the Iranian coast. The operation lasted from Tuesday 22:00 GMT to nearly 01:00 Wednesday, hitting about 20 targets, including air defense systems, ground control stations, and surveillance radar sites, covering Qeshm Island, Goruk, Bandar Abbas, Jask, Sirik, and Minab, stretching along and into the Strait of Hormuz. The Pentagon's statement: "Self-defense strikes," a "proportionate response" to "Iran's unprovoked aggression."

According to Iranian state TV, the "proportionate response" on the ground resulted in: two water reservoirs near Sirik being hit, cutting off drinking water for about 20,000 people in the Bamani area. Next time you hear the term "surgical strike," remember this.

The same night, Iran retaliated. Iran's Revolutionary Guard said it launched 21 strikes against US targets in the region – drones hit the US Fifth Fleet in Bahrain and Ali Al Salem Air Base in Kuwait, while long-range missiles targeted the Azraq Air Base in Jordan; they claimed to have destroyed an F-35 hangar there. Jordan said it shot down 5 missiles. Iranian Foreign Minister Araghchi, using a tone of deterrence Trump thinks he possesses, said: "If you want security, leave our region." Iranian Parliament Speaker Ghalibaf said: "We prefer to use diplomatic language, but other languages we speak more fluently."

Wednesday morning. And then – right here – the truly key moment appears. Trump was back on Truth Social, the "Master Dealmaker" completely unmasked:

"The Iranian military is in total disarray. Most of their forces, like the navy and air force, don't even exist anymore – they have been completely defeated. Iran is all talk, no action. The Middle East bully is dead!!! They took too long to negotiate a deal that was extremely favorable to them, and now they must pay!!!"

"They took too long to negotiate."

Too long. This from the person who, just the day before, claimed the deal was in its "final stage" and could be signed "within two or three days." Also the person who, after leaving the NBA Finals Monday night, said the two sides were in the final stages of a "very, very good deal" that would "immediately" reopen the Strait of Hormuz once signed.

The "Two or Three Days" Industrial Complex

There is something I want you to think about carefully. Throughout this entire war, Trump has been telling us: the deal is almost here. By Sunday, the war has been going on for over 100 days. By my count – yes, I recorded every single one because someone has to – since this conflict erupted at the end of February, Trump has promised an imminent, shiny, close-at-hand deal over thirty times.

Let's pull a few receipts from the drawer:

March 23rd: Announced "very good and productive" talks, delaying a previously threatened strike on power plants by five days. Iran's response? They directly denied any talks occurred. Oil prices dropped initially, then rebounded after Tehran called out his claim.

Late March: Threatened to "destroy" Iran's power plants within 48 hours if they didn't open the strait. They didn't open. He didn't strike.

April: Announced a "10-day pause on destroying energy facilities." A ceasefire was declared. Then talks in Pakistan, brokered mainly by Islamabad, ended inconclusively.

This week: "Final stage." "Two or three days." "Will open immediately upon signing."

Wednesday: "They took too long. Must pay."

This is not negotiation. This is a slot machine that only dispenses media exposure. Every time the lever is pulled, the screen shows the same three cherries: Deal is almost done, other side is weak, trust me.

And every single time, JD Vance stands by to endorse him – Sunday, he told CBS the administration was "very close" to a deal. Very close. The two most abused words in this administration, probably just barely losing out to "perfect phone call."

Let's Pull the Mask Off

Behind the "Trust Me, Bro" lies this.

If you were really in control of the negotiations, you wouldn't need to bomb water reservoirs to prove you're winning. If you were really in control, your counterpart wouldn't fire 21 missiles at three of your bases the same night. If you were really in control, your diplomatic posture wouldn't flip like a mood ring from "a very, very good deal" to "the bully of the Middle East is dead" within 18 hours, the only external factor seemingly being his mood about cable news coverage.

The blockade he constantly boasts about – in his words, "the most successful blockade in naval history" – hasn't stopped Iran from striking throughout the region, hasn't reopened the Strait of Hormuz, and hasn't resulted in any deal. A shopkeeper in Tehran even told CBS this week that his store shelves were still full. But of course, this can still be called "the most successful." He also wrote "Praise be to God" – I have many questions about that, but that's for another article.

Here's where the facade truly crumbles: The strait is still closed. The one concrete goal this war supposedly truly aimed for – reopening the chokepoint for one-fifth of the global oil supply – remains unachieved after over 100 days. This period saw dozens of "imminent" deals, a naval blockade, and now a new round of strikes. Oil prices rose nearly 2%. Markets fell. And the man at the center of it all is still posting in all caps, declaring a "bully" dead.

This isn't leverage. This is a person who lost control and steered the car off the road around March, spending three months insisting he meant to drift it into the guardrail.

The Bottom Line

It's good that the two pilots are safe, the only clean outcome in the whole affair. But tonight, 20,000 people in southern Iran have no drinking water, three US allies were hit by missiles, an F-35 hangar in Jordan is potentially smoldering rubble, and the person responsible for it all is treating the event like a pro-wrestling promo.

Every "two or three days" is either a lie or delusion. By now, the difference between the two is irrelevant. You cannot say the deal is in its "final stage" on Tuesday, say "they took too long" on Wednesday, and still expect anyone with a functioning memory to trust your judgment about the situation on Thursday.

So, next time you hear "we are very close," whether from Trump, Vance, or anyone else in the administration, do the only rational thing left.

Count it down. Write it down. And assume the opposite is true.

Because "Trust Me, Bro" stopped being foreign policy around the time of the twelfth promise of an imminent deal. We are now well past thirty.

This is clearly worth remembering.

Original Link

นโยบาย
คนที่กล้าหาญ
ยินดีต้อนรับเข้าร่วมชุมชนทางการของ Odaily
กลุ่มสมาชิก
https://t.me/Odaily_News
กลุ่มสนทนา
https://t.me/Odaily_GoldenApe
บัญชีทางการ
https://twitter.com/OdailyChina
กลุ่มสนทนา
https://t.me/Odaily_CryptoPunk
ค้นหา
สารบัญบทความ
ดาวน์โหลดแอพ Odaily พลาเน็ตเดลี่
ให้คนบางกลุ่มเข้าใจ Web3.0 ก่อน
IOS
Android