Squeezing In Before the Senate Flips: Trump Nominates Four SEC and CFTC Commissioners, Ushering in a New Era for Crypto Regulation
- Key Takeaway: Trump has nominated four candidates for SEC and CFTC commissioner positions, several of whom have crypto legislative or enforcement backgrounds. However, the nominations are primarily aimed at filling long-standing seat vacancies and restoring bipartisan composition rather than signaling new regulatory policy.
- Key Elements:
- The SEC and CFTC each nominated one Republican and one Democrat, all of whom must be confirmed by the Senate; the two agencies currently have only 2 and 1 commissioners respectively, and will still be below full strength even after confirmation.
- CFTC candidates Anonick and Rowland have both worked on matters related to the CLARITY Act, which would authorize the CFTC to regulate spot intermediaries for digital commodities, but the bill failed to advance in a procedural vote in September.
- SEC candidate Johnson, a former CFTC commissioner, publicly supported DeFi enforcement actions against Opyn, Deridex, and ZeroEx in 2023, advocating for scrutiny of intermediary liability in off-chain clearing centralization.
- SEC candidate Levine previously served as a senior staffer in the early days of the SEC's Crypto Task Force and is set to fill the commissioner seat vacated by Hester Peirce.
- Republicans will lose their Senate majority in January, leaving a limited nomination window; the bipartisan slate is intended to garner broader support and advance the confirmation process by year-end.
Author: angelilu, Foresight News
On November 12, Trump submitted to the Senate nominations for four financial regulatory commissioners: one Republican and one Democrat each for the SEC and CFTC. Both CFTC candidates, Nathan Anonick and Matthew Rowland, have been involved in crypto market structure legislation. SEC candidate Kristin Johnson has publicly supported the CFTC's enforcement actions against three DeFi operators. Their backgrounds give this round of appointments a concrete connection to crypto regulation.

The proposed agencies and party affiliations of the four candidates, all pending Senate confirmation
The SEC and CFTC are the two most important regulators of the U.S. crypto market. When token issuance and trading involve securities regulation, the SEC is responsible; crypto derivatives and event contracts in prediction markets fall primarily under the CFTC's purview. How digital assets are classified and how trading platforms register often involves the jurisdictional boundaries of both agencies. Both agencies are structured with five commissioners, with no more than three from the same party; commissioners participate in rulemaking, supervision, and enforcement decisions.
There is also a direct reason for these nominations: the seats have been vacant for a long time. After Hester Peirce left the SEC in October of this year, the agency was left with only Chair Paul Atkins and Commissioner Mark Uyeda; the CFTC currently has only one commissioner, Chair Michael Selig. SEC and CFTC commissioners are nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate; Trump's submission of this list is only the first step in filling the vacancies. Even if all four are confirmed, the SEC would only go from two to four members and the CFTC from one to three, still short of full complement. Therefore, the significance of this round of personnel changes lies in adding commissioners who participate in discussions and votes, rather than announcing a new set of policies.
Both CFTC Picks Were Involved in the CLARITY Act

Anonick is a legislative advisor to Senate Agriculture Committee Chairman John Boozman, long responsible for cryptocurrency, futures, and derivatives issues. According to The Block, he was one of the committee's lead negotiators on provisions related to the CLARITY Act. The legislative text advanced by the committee in January this year proposed authorizing the CFTC to regulate spot intermediaries for digital commodities and to establish requirements for trading platform registration, customer fund segregation, and conflict-of-interest management. In September, the CLARITY Act failed to pass the procedural vote needed to advance consideration in the Senate.
The other CFTC candidate, Rowland, also has crypto legislative experience. He is a CFTC attorney detailed to the Senate Agriculture Committee and has participated in the agency's enforcement work. According to The Block, he was involved in work related to the CLARITY Act as well as the Agriculture Committee's 2024 crypto legislation work. If both are confirmed, the CFTC will gain two commissioners familiar with digital commodity regulatory legislation at the same time.
Within its existing authority, the CFTC in June this year proposed draft rules on event contracts, discussing how to review contracts related to activities such as sporting events. If the two new commissioners take office, they will review and vote on such rules together with the sole sitting commissioner, Chair Michael Selig.

Two SEC Picks: One Backed DeFi Enforcement, One Set to Replace Peirce
Johnson is a former CFTC commissioner and currently a professor at George Washington University Law School. In 2023, after the CFTC took enforcement action against Opyn, Deridex, and ZeroEx, she publicly supported those cases and proposed a test: if a platform concentrates key clearing or settlement functions off-chain, regulators should examine whether the operator is in fact performing an intermediary function.
In the same statement, she discussed customer identification, customer asset segregation, conflict-of-interest management, and liquidity reserves, and also called for clearer rules. If she joins the SEC, the questions she raised at the CFTC will have a securities-regulation version: when trading involves securities law, who actually controls the platform, and who should bear registration and investor protection obligations?
If she joins the SEC, Johnson will face similar but not identical questions: what registration obligations crypto trading platforms must fulfill, which participants in DeFi projects are accountable to investors, and how exemptions should apply. Her CFTC statements can indicate the direction to watch; the specific choices under SEC authority will depend on how she answers new issues.

The other SEC candidate, Levine, served as a senior staffer at the agency during the early stage of its adjustment of the crypto regulatory framework. In January 2025, then-Acting Chair Mark Uyeda established a cryptocurrency working group led by "Crypto Mom" Hester Peirce. The following month, the SEC announced that Levine would serve as Uyeda's deputy chief of staff. He later became general counsel and senior advisor to the White House Council of Economic Advisers, and this nomination is to fill the commissioner seat left vacant by Peirce.
Bipartisan Nominations as the Leadership Transition Countdown Begins
The four still must be confirmed by the Senate, and Republicans will lose their Senate majority in January next year, leaving Trump little time to have the current Senate confirm his picks. Submitting Republican and Democratic candidates together at this time both responds to the two agencies' requirement to restore bipartisan commissioner configuration and seeks broader support for advancing nominations before year-end. Democratic senators publicly urged the White House to nominate Democrats as early as June this year; now Johnson and Rowland have entered the confirmation process alongside Levine and Anonick.
This is a bipartisan slate with political weight, but whether a real deal exists depends on how the Senate schedules hearings and votes next. If all four are confirmed, the SEC will go from two commissioners to four, and the CFTC from one to three.
Crypto PACs can spend money in congressional elections to support candidates who endorse their policies; but SEC and CFTC commissioners are nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate. They also hold voting power and participate in determining the specific regulatory rules for trading platforms, DeFi, and prediction markets. This is why the four individuals' backgrounds deserve close attention: party affiliation only shows where they come from, while their past work and public statements can indicate how they will judge the issues facing the industry.
The upcoming Senate hearings will be the first important window for observing the four's regulatory inclinations.


