In the world of blockchain, there are not many people who can compare with Vitalik in terms of technology, but BM should be one of them (only discussing technical aspects), as far as I know, he has created three blockchain projects in a row Yes, namely BTS, steemit and EOS, these three projects are still running up to now, his most famous project should be the EOS public chain, among these three projects I know EOS best.

EOS can be said to be a typical project that held a good hand but was eventually beaten to pieces. It reached TOP5 at the highest market value, but now its market value ranking has fallen out of the top 20. There were a lot of EOS holders at one time, but due to the performance of B1, many EOS bigwigs have left EOS.

When EOS was first established, it said it wanted to reach one million TPS, and even surpassed ETH. It was true that when it was first launched, many projects on ETH were migrating to EOS. It felt that the performance of EOS could meet the needs of a large number of commercial DAPPs, but As the parent company of EOS, Block one, the support for the ecology is too small, and a large amount of money raised through the EOS ICO was bought into US treasury bonds and Bitcoin, and almost no money was invested in the EOS ecology, which eventually led to more and more Most of the EOS project parties have left the EOS ecosystem and turned to support other public chains. It has become impossible for EOS to surpass ETH. In this wave of DeFi, ETH DeFi is the leader, while EOS, like other public chains, is just an imitator.

In fact, objectively speaking, EOS technology is quite good, and the EOS DAPP experience is also very good, but for a public chain ecology, it must be spent on the ecology. In contrast to Ethereum and Polkadot, the reason why the ecology develops One of the most important reasons for their prosperity is that they all have foundation support behind them, such as the Web3 Foundation, which has given a lot of technical support and financial support to projects in the Polkadot ecosystem, and even an excellent project can be awarded many times. The grant of Web3 will solve the financial difficulties encountered in project development, and the project development can be carried out without any worries.

Only when public chain projects pay attention to the ecology and provide a large amount of technical support and financial support to the projects in the ecology, will they attract more developers to develop. Nothing has been done above, so how can developers have confidence in EOS?

Although some project parties in the EOS ecology have carried out ecological self-rescue, after all, their strength and influence are limited, and they will not have much effect on the development of the EOS ecology. If the EOS ecology wants to think about it, B1 must participate. Only when everyone has confidence in B1 again can the EOS ecology develop.

In this wave of DeFi, B1 has nothing to do. The IBC and bulish that have been rumored have not come out yet. The EOS Foundation proposed by B1 last year has no follow-up news until today. BB, BM It's really unreliable to speak.

A very ironic fact is that B1 may be the richest blockchain team in the currency circle, but the EOS ecology is the most short of money. Judging from the tone of B1, it is impossible for B1 to provide a large amount of financial support for the EOS ecology. If B1 does not have great determination and practical actions to support the EOS ecology, then the EOS ecology will basically not develop.

Through the performance of B1, everyone has already seen clearly that the B1 team basically only seeks benefits for themselves, regardless of the life and death of the EOS ecology. From the perspective of investment, they are very successful in EOS. The money raised through EOS Buying treasury bonds and BTC has already made them a lot of money. With 200,000 pies in their hands, if they do nothing else, they will be rich in the future. Their first task is to protect the existing bitcoins in their hands, and they don't care about EOS.

For BM personally, he said at the beginning that he would not leave EOS, but he did not leave EOS in the end, and soon announced his new project Clarion.

BM created three projects, but they all left after all, and his reputation is getting worse and worse. Everyone jokes that he is good at making unfinished buildings. But having said that, EOS also rose dozens of times at the beginning, and everyone was very optimistic at one time, but the follow-up performance of B1 also greatly exceeded everyone's expectations. The project is not bad, but the team is indeed too bad.

For BM's new project Clarion, there is no more news at present. If a new project is launched in a bull market, generally speaking, the price will rise. I don't know how the project is progressing, and I don't know if I can catch up with this wave In a bull market, for the same project, there will be a big difference in price performance between a bull market and a bear market.

For the new project released by BM this time, I believe that many people will not pay for it again. Even if they still pay for him, based on the follow-up performance of the other three projects, they should be released soon when the price is similar. Accompany BM to the end, BM may run faster than others.

As for BM’s launch of new projects, does it indicate that this round of bull market has reached the middle and late stages? Obviously, there is no strict logical reasoning. Maybe it’s just a coincidence of the previous projects. We all have to make our own independent judgments. After all, real money We invest our money in ourselves.

For the judgment of the follow-up market trend, I personally tend to think that it may be in the middle of the bull market, and I am cautiously optimistic. This year, the price of Bitcoin will still break new highs. I only use BM to issue new projects as the criterion for judging bulls and bears , I think it's too hasty, and BM doesn't seem to have such a big influence anymore.