US Congress Discusses Fed's "Skinny Master Account," Evaluating Whether Crypto and Fintech Companies Can Directly Access the Central Bank's Payment System
The U.S. House Financial Services Committee held a hearing on Wednesday to discuss the changing roles of banks and fintech companies, with a key focus on the Federal Reserve's proposed "skinny master account" plan, which would allow certain crypto banks and fintech companies limited direct access to the Fed's payment system.
A Federal Reserve master account enables financial institutions to directly use the Fed's payment network and gain the most direct access to the U.S. dollar monetary system. Institutions without such accounts typically rely on partner banks that hold master accounts to provide services. The so-called "skinny account" is a limited-functionality version intended to provide restricted access for new types of financial institutions.
Republican Representative Dan Meuser stated during the hearing that access to the Federal Reserve's payment system is a significant matter, with the core question being which institutions should be allowed to directly use these critical payment rails. Traditional institutions like community banks worry that crypto and fintech companies, not subject to equally stringent regulations, could pose safety and soundness risks if given direct access.
The crypto industry generally supports the proposal, arguing that direct access to the Fed's payment system is long overdue, as it would help reduce reliance on intermediary banks and foster innovation. In May, former President Trump also signed an executive order requiring the Federal Reserve to assess policies for opening central bank payment rails to fintech companies, including crypto firms.
Previously, the Kansas City Fed approved in March a "limited purpose account" for Kraken's parent company, Payward, sparking debate over the extent to which crypto and fintech companies should have direct access to Fed services. A representative from Anchorage Digital stated at the hearing that for the U.S. to remain a global financial hub, it must allow for innovative federal and state regulatory frameworks.
