Risk Warning: Beware of illegal fundraising in the name of 'virtual currency' and 'blockchain'. — Five departments including the Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission
Information
Discover
Search
Login
简中
繁中
English
日本語
한국어
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
BTC
ETH
HTX
SOL
BNB
View Market
Vitalik: L2 is consistent with the underlying scaling method of sharding, but key challenges such as coordination need to be addressed
2024-05-23 05:01
Odaily News Vitalik Buterin published an article today titled "How do layer 2s really differ from execution sharding?", in which he mentioned that in public discourse, "Layer 2" and "sharding" are often described as two opposite strategies for how to scale blockchain. But when you look at the underlying technology, you'll find a puzzle: the actual underlying scaling methods are exactly the same. You have some data shards. You have fraud provers or ZK-SNARK proofs. You have cross-(rollup, shard) communication solutions. The main difference is: who is responsible for building and updating these parts, and how much autonomy do they have? An ecosystem centered on L2 is a very real sharding in the technical sense, but in this sharding, you can create your own shards with your own rules. This is powerful and supports a lot of creativity and autonomous innovation. But it also faces key challenges, especially in terms of coordination. For an L2-centric ecosystem like Ethereum to succeed, it needs to understand these challenges and address them head-on in order to gain as many benefits of an L1-centric ecosystem as possible and get as close to the best of both worlds as possible.