Controversial EOS, the three major benefits come together, the bull market counterattack or decline?

EOS has attracted many people's attention recently, and the reason is that the news of Google Cloud two days ago caused a small sensation in the currency circle.

I believe everyone has heard about this news, and there are various interpretations on the market.

To sum it up in one sentence: continue to be optimistic about what you are optimistic about, and continue to be optimistic about what you are not optimistic about.

Therefore, I think that everyone needs to listen to the big V's interpretation of eos.

The interpretation you see is most likely just a few words, and it depends entirely on the author's past position.

For example, William, who posts popular comments in the currency circle every day, did not post anything related this time, but instead posted a Weibo that seemed to be insinuating eos.

And if you often read William's Weibo, you know that William has never been optimistic about eos.

On the contrary, Milk King's Weibo is overwhelmingly all related to the benefits of EOS.

Therefore, in the judgment of eos, everyone still has to have their own logic.

Of course, the reason why eos has such a clear black and white controversy is probably because it was too highly praised when it was first launched.

The greater the so-called expectation, the greater the disappointment.

Going back to the positives, besides Google Cloud joining the eos network, there are two other positives that deserve attention.

One is that the former CTO of Goldman Sachs announced to join B1, and this news was also confirmed on bm's Twitter.

The other is eosfinex, which is dominated by bitfinex, launched the eos mainnet.

Needless to say about the former, many people may not know much about the latter, eosfinex.

It is actually an EOS decentralized exchange, but this exchange is different from the traditional dex like uniswap that we think of.

Its order matching is carried out off-chain, while storage and settlement are carried out online.

Moreover, since order matching is carried out off-chain, it means that bitfinex can share depth with it.

And this point was also highlighted by bitfinex in the introduction of eosfinex.

This idea is also very consistent with the design philosophy of eos, which is to sacrifice a part of decentralization to achieve high performance.

So how does this compare to a solution like uniswap?

I think for users, eosfinex's solution is better.

After all, for most users, they don't care what the technology behind it is, what they care about is the experience of this product.

However, putting aside the experience, from a technical perspective, it will cause some confusion.

For example, what is the difference between such dex and cex? eosfinex seems more like an enhanced version of cex.

But the enhancements make people feel a little bit painless, not revolutionary enough or subversive enough.

Of course, the above are just thoughts on the exchange itself. Leaving aside the exchange itself, eosfinex’s contribution to and increase in the eos ecosystem is unquestionable.

With the arrival of eosfinex, the first point of contribution is obviously that the eos version of usdt will be issued in large numbers. The benefits of this point can be known by referring to Ethereum and Tron.

The second point is that the eos version of dex supported by bitfinex obviously has a strong drainage and promotion effect on hot projects such as defi and nft of eos.

We can see this from the contribution of mykey, Gacha, and Tiger Talisman to eos defi.

Compared with the drainage effect of these companies, bitfinex is obviously several orders of magnitude stronger.

In general, the recent waves of eos have been positive, and people have seen the dawn of the eos ecology.

And, more importantly, these waves of benefits are not short-term hype, but actually doing things for the ecology.

Therefore, for this controversial project, eos, I think everyone should start to pay some attention.