เมื่อการขยายขนาดเพิ่มความเร็ว Ethereum Foundation เปิดตัว "Hardness" เพื่อรักษาขีดจำกัดล่าง

Original Title: A Deeper Look at a New Protocol Cluster Priority: Hardness

Original Source: Ethereum Foundation

Original Compilation: Deep Tide TechFlow

Introduction: The Ethereum Foundation recently announced three major protocol cluster priorities: Scaling, User Experience, and Hardness. The first two are easy to understand, but what is the third one?

Simply put, Hardness is a protocol-level commitment to Ethereum's core attributes, including censorship resistance, privacy, security, and permissionlessness.

This article is written by three Foundation members responsible for the Hardness direction, detailing the specific work content and priorities in this area. The full text is as follows:

What is Hardness

The Ethereum Foundation recently published a blog post outlining three protocol cluster priorities: Scaling, User Experience (UX), and Hardness.

Each addresses different needs for Ethereum's long-term success. Scaling ensures the network can handle global-level demand, UX ensures people can actually use it, and Hardness ensures that as Ethereum grows, it does not lose the core attributes that make it worth using.

Hardness refers to a system's ability to remain reliable in the future. The Hardness direction is a protocol-level commitment aimed at preserving Ethereum's core guarantees: open source, censorship resistance, privacy, security, permissionlessness, and trust minimization.

These principles have existed since Ethereum's inception.

Ethereum exists to provide neutral infrastructure for those who truly need it, even if that means being harder, slower, or less convenient. In practice, this means ensuring Ethereum continues to function when centralized systems fail.

Who needs this? Users in sanctioned countries, journalists protecting sources, organizations needing neutral settlement infrastructure, institutions looking to reduce counterparty risk.

Why Focus on Hardness Now

Ethereum is advancing major upgrades in throughput and usability. But every improvement could potentially be achieved by taking shortcuts, such as centralized infrastructure or introducing trusted intermediaries.

Hardness exists to ensure that as Ethereum responds to network demands, it does not deviate from its values.

Today, individuals and institutions rely on these guarantees from Ethereum not as ideals, but as necessities. This makes Hardness an increasingly critical area of focus.

What Does Hardness Look Like in Practice

Within the Ethereum Foundation, the Hardness direction is advanced by three individuals, each with a different focus:

· Thomas Thiery: Censorship resistance and permissionlessness, focusing on the protocol layer.

· Fredrik Svantes: Security, with an emphasis on privacy and trust minimization.

· Parithosh Jayanthi: Infrastructure, upgrades, and the resilience of sensitive parts of the Ethereum protocol.

Hardness spans multiple domains:

Beyond technical research and development, part of the work in the Hardness direction involves helping more people understand and value these core attributes. The team also collaborates with work related to ZK, privacy, scaling, user experience, and security (such as Trillion Dollar Security, which focuses more on the wallet and application layer) to ensure these improvements do not compromise security or decentralization while accelerating development.

Specific work includes:

Network Resilience: Improving tools, testing, and fuzzing to discover vulnerabilities early and ensure the network can recover quickly from failures.

User Protection: Reducing preventable fund losses due to phishing and malicious approvals.

Privacy: Advancing private transactions and anonymous broadcasting at the protocol layer, allowing users to obtain strong privacy guarantees without leaving L1.

Maintaining Neutrality: Eliminating single points of failure at the network edges to ensure the network remains neutral and resilient in the face of selective interference.

Long-term Preparedness: Post-quantum cryptography is not an immediate threat, but it is an inevitable one that must be prepared for in advance.

Fallback and Recovery Modes: As throughput increases, the protocol must have the ability to slow down and stabilize when anomalies occur, allowing the network to self-heal rather than cascade into failure.

Incident Response Readiness: Developing shared, public emergency playbooks so the ecosystem can respond quickly and transparently in extreme scenarios.

Measuring Reality: Establishing metrics to measure the current level of censorship resistance in the ecosystem, how many users can transact privately, where trust assumptions are quietly creeping in, and other issues.

Original Link