BTC
ETH
HTX
SOL
BNB
View Market
简中
繁中
English
日本語
한국어
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt

In just 70 days, Polymarket easily raked in tens of millions in fees

Azuma
Odaily资深作者
@azuma_eth
2026-03-16 10:34
This article is about 1858 words, reading the full article takes about 3 minutes
The money printing machine is already running, and its future ceiling depends solely on two major variables.
AI Summary
Expand
  • Core Viewpoint: After ending its zero-fee model and gradually expanding its fee-charging scope, Polymarket's fee revenue has shown strong growth, largely validating the considerable revenue potential of the prediction market business model. Future growth will primarily depend on increased trading volume and further expansion of the markets subject to fees.
  • Key Elements:
    1. Since fees were introduced on January 6th, Polymarket has accumulated over $11.2 million in fees, with weekly revenue growing consistently from $560,000 to $1.84 million, showing a clear upward trend.
    2. The fee scope has expanded from the initial "15-minute cryptocurrency price movement" markets to all cryptocurrency-related markets, which is one of the core drivers of revenue growth.
    3. Based on a static projection using data from March 9th to 15th, if fees were extended to all markets, Polymarket's annual revenue could potentially reach $360 million.
    4. The platform has distributed a cumulative $13.41 million in subsidies to liquidity providers (LPs), and the fee revenue for March is expected to cover this total expenditure.
    5. The key variables for future revenue growth lie in the sustained increase of overall trading volume and the successful extension of fees to more markets beyond cryptocurrency.

Original | Odaily (@OdailyChina)

Author|Azuma (@azuma_eth)

On January 6th of this year, Polymarket officially ended its "zero-fee" model, beginning to trial transaction fees starting with its "15-minute cryptocurrency up/down" markets. The specific fee percentage varies with the market's real-time odds — the closer the odds are to 0% or 100%, the lower the fee; conversely, the closer the odds are to 50%, the higher the fee, with a maximum of 1.56%.

Later, on January 28th, about three weeks after the fees were implemented, we published an article titled "Data Estimates Show Polymarket Could Easily Achieve Over $100 Million in Annual Revenue, Assuming...". Based on Polymarket's trading volume and transaction activity structure at the time, the article provided a static estimate: in the most conservative scenario, if the scope of fee-charging markets remained unchanged, Polymarket was projected to generate approximately $38 million in annual revenue. In the most aggressive scenario, if Polymarket extended fees to all markets, the estimated annual fee revenue could reach $418 million.

When we last estimated Polymarket's revenue, we struggled with an overly short observation period and too few calculable samples. Now, nearly two months later, we have used richer data to re-estimate Polymarket's revenue prospects. The results show that the so-called "conservative" estimate was indeed too conservative, and the "aggressive" projection is not as exaggerated as it might seem.

Changes in Revenue Data

According to data compiled by Gate Research on Dune, since transaction fees were introduced on January 6th, Polymarket has accumulated over $11.2 million in fee revenue.

Applying the most conservative static estimation method again, assuming the trading volume and transaction activity structure of the relevant markets remain unchanged, Polymarket is projected to generate approximately $58.4 million in annual revenue.

However, this estimation method does not accurately reflect Polymarket's revenue-generating capacity.

The reason is that Polymarket's revenue data is visibly growing — over the past 10 weeks, the platform's weekly fee revenue has been $560k, $786k, $633k, $749k, $1.08 million, $1.28 million, $1.35 million, $1.29 million, $1.63 million, $1.84 million... showing significant growth almost every week.

Reasons for Revenue Growth

There are two main reasons for the growth in Polymarket's fee revenue. First, Polymarket has expanded the scope of markets subject to fees. Second, both Polymarket's overall trading volume and the trading volume in fee-charging markets have been continuously increasing.

Regarding the scope of fee-charging markets, on March 6th, Polymarket extended the fee mechanism to all cryptocurrency-related markets. Additionally, earlier, it had trialed fee collection in sports markets like NCAA and Serie A. However, the former (cryptocurrency-related markets) remains the primary source of fee revenue.

Regarding trading volume, the data dashboard compiled by Data Dashboards on Dune shows that Polymarket's weekly overall trading volume and cryptocurrency market volume (the bottom purple bars) have been consistently growing.

Future Revenue Projection

When we last projected Polymarket's revenue, we had to manually extract the trading volume share of "15-minute cryptocurrency up/down" related markets within all cryptocurrency-related markets. Now, since Polymarket extended fees to all cryptocurrency-related markets on March 6th, this estimation is much more straightforward. As for NCAA and Serie A, perhaps because the former hasn't entered the official "March Madness" tournament yet, and the latter doesn't have significant cultural traction in the US, the trading volume in these markets is vastly smaller compared to cryptocurrency markets and will be temporarily ignored here.

Taking data from the only full week after March 6th (March 9th-15th), the trading volume of cryptocurrency-related events accounted for 26.7% of Polymarket's total platform volume that week. In the same week, Polymarket's fee revenue was approximately $1.84 million. Based on this ratio for a static projection, at the current trading volume level and transaction structure, if Polymarket introduced a similar fee model across all markets, it could potentially bring in $360 million in annual revenue for the platform.

The Money Printer is Already Running

It's worth noting that, as a key measure to enhance liquidity, Polymarket has distributed a total of $13.41 million in subsidies to liquidity providers (LPs) to date. In contrast, if the data for the remaining ten-plus days of March continues the performance seen in the first half of the month, Polymarket's fee revenue for this month alone could cover the total liquidity subsidy expenditure.

Polymarket has largely demonstrated the revenue-generating potential of the prediction market as a new business model. Future revenue growth will primarily depend on two variables — how much more trading volume can grow, and whether fees can be further extended to more markets.

If these two variables continue to trend upward, prediction markets might become the simplest and most direct "money printer" in the cryptocurrency industry.

Prediction Market
Welcome to Join Odaily Official Community