Zi Cen: "Black" EOS, no one can be more professional than me
textTrends are never wrong, all we can do is understand and follow. If what we black is actually only part of the trend, then it is meaningless.
textNot only EOS, but actually all public chain projects are struggling. Faced with the soul torture of the market "what is the use of your eggs", they are shy and embarrassed to say the answer "I am actually useless".
EOS was born in Ethereum, although I once said, "The goal of surpassing ETH is too small for EOS." The super popularity of EOS actually stems from the unexpected rise of ETH in the big bull market in 2017. I say "accident" because it shocked everyone's jaws, even for the most diehard fans of ETH. The accident also means that almost everyone missed out on ETH's super bonus, especially exchanges. In 2017, the four major domestic exchanges at that time almost watched Yunbi, which had been struggling on the verge of bankruptcy, and took advantage of ETH to become the world's largest exchange.
text. The entire market needs the next ETH, and this outlet is actually created by all of us. Before EOS, mainstream exchanges actively endorsed projects other than BTC, which had never happened before. When EOS has not yet launched the main network and only has the code of the semi-finished product on github, the major exchanges have already swarmed and announced their participation in the super node election.
If you can understand the risks involved, you will know that the effectiveness of this kind of credit endorsement is extremely terrifying. From the perspective of an exchange, endorsing a project that has not been launched on the main network is tantamount to shouting for air.
DPOS voting governance is a genius design, and fairness has never been a slot.
First of all, I need to clarify a truth with all adults: don't expect "fairness", we are not worthy. The big players who can really affect the pattern never care about fairness, but only find ways to play the cards in their hands well. The real "fairness" to be achieved in the free market is to allow those who have the strength to make money to make money. The goal of DPOS is a blockchain bottom layer with low cost, high performance, high security and high decision-making efficiency. There have never been any rules, which should be designed for the pursuit of fairness, and neither is POW.
The exchange running for a super node is a huge endorsement for any project. For other projects, it is necessary to ask for the layout of the exchange node.
On another level, the design of EOS voting and governance rules allows Blockone to create a super traffic effect without paying any cost. At that time, almost all the leading forces in the entire currency circle were involved, and a large amount of cost was invested in the campaign to build momentum, while EOS paid only 1% of the future additional issuance, and these costs would be naturally digested by the secondary market.
textDPOS is a successful, and ingenious design.In fact, almost all projects after EOS are copying the "super node" model while spraying EOS.However, things backfired. Whether it is the marketing popularity, traffic effect or community activity that can be finally achieved, they are far from each other.
So far, I have not seen a materially progressive economic model on any of these projects. Copying while blacking out, blacking out the idea and copying the essence.
BM has strong creativity and execution ability. DPOS algorithm, graphene high-performance blockchain, decentralized exchange, and decentralized stable currency are all his original creations. Even because his creation is too advanced, a group of idiots in the entire industry They sprayed it for four or five years, and it took four or five years before they realized it and regarded these concepts as "outlets."
Even with crowdfunding, the gameplay of EOS is different from any project. It is also this unique way of playing that investors began to move bricks between the primary market and the secondary market and continued for a whole year, making EOS the most liquid new project in the crowdfunding period , becoming the third choice besides BTC and ETH, the attitude of the exchange will not lie.
And with such a genius with such high creativity and execution ability, it only takes a little to keep him, let him let go and play according to his own ideas. Of course I'm sorry, he won't cater to anyone's ideas, our choice is to understand and follow, or despair and leave. Conversely, if his creativity is suppressed forcibly, he will leave, like what happened with BTS and Steemit.
textChina is not a black spot. China's competitiveness in the field of digital currency and blockchain is dominant. Projects without the support of China are garbage projects. The support of Bitcoin mining is in China, and ETH is also formed in China. Believe me, China has always been excellent, especially on the application side. Most of the overseas projects you see are not as reliable as the Chinese team.
text
The real reason for EOS to fall into the current embarrassing situation is that after September 4, 2017, Blockone completely withdrew from the Chinese market and gave up all its due efforts in China. The closest one to us is the Global Hackathon, Hong Kong station.China's developer community, third-party product teams, and user communities have not received the respect and support they deserve. Our strength is constantly being consumed out of thin air in the bear market, and we are constantly losing blood.
In particular, EOS once attracted the participation of almost all the backbones of China's digital currency industry, but after many teams invested huge costs and resources with great ambitions but failed, it can be foreseen that the remaining road will be much tormented.
Even after reaching a settlement with the SEC, I still don't see any signs of Blockone's real move in the Chinese market. Similarly, Voice's ignorance of the Chinese market also surprised me. Legal risk can be regarded as a "legitimate" reason, but it is not a reason that the market can accept.
