Vitalik: The Ideal Far Future of AI Results in Deep Integration of Humans and Machines While Preserving Global Pluralism

Odaily Odaily reported that Vitalik stated on platform X that one direction for future AI development is a deeper integration of humans and machines, including computers working more collaboratively with humans, identifying conscious and subconscious signals emitted by humans, brain-computer interfaces, and computer-assisted telepathy that helps multiple people better understand each other and cooperate. Its ultimate form is to eliminate the binary division between humans and machines and open up various positions on this spectrum.

Vitalik hopes that deeply integrated humans and machines can outperform separate humans and machines, and this should continue until the technological ceiling is reached. The far-future AI outcomes he envisions include: global political and economic pluralism is preserved, with no single company or government dominating; humans can choose to accept technological upgrades to explore the universe at a level competitive with pure machines, or maintain the status quo and act in the world through robots that take orders; most of the Earth could become highly regulated nature reserves, where people can continue their current lifestyle, and those who wish to do more radical things would go to space.

AI itself may become too powerful compared to other alternatives, a certain country or company may gain a decisive advantage and lock it in permanently, powerful technological means could cause incalculable harm, and the path of human-machine integration itself may not retain enough humanity, ultimately becoming just another way to create powerful robots. Therefore, he hopes to pass through this narrow passage at a slower pace and is supportive of proposals for deceleration or moratorium, including ideas like Mutual Assured Compute Destruction that can provide braking opportunities.

Vitalik stated that his ideal world is one where open-weight models prevail, and Dean Ball's judgment that open-weight models have a decelerationist effect by curbing capital expenditure on frontier models is completely correct, even though it will drive more capital expenditure on peripheral devices and applications. This can achieve deceleration without resorting to harsher political means. However, he believes one should not expect the world to naturally provide convenient economic and physical laws. Humanity still has a certain degree of agency over political laws, and there are many ways to change incentives without letting a single authority take control, and these should be utilized.