SBF is actually behind BALD? How do "Twitter detectives" view this?

A thousand-fold BALD that once dominated the Base ecosystem, with an increase of around 2000% in about 14 hours. But just a few hours later, $BALD revealed its fangs and destroyed everything. The project suddenly withdrew a total of 8660 ETH and 179 million $BALD tokens in liquidity within 7 minutes, causing a significant drop in the price of $BALD, with a maximum decline of 80%.

As of last night, there is only 6 ETH left in the liquidity pool of $BALD. Although the ETH in the pool has increased to about 120 coins this morning, the TVL of the Base network has plummeted from around 42 million USD to 12.59 million USD. The rise and fall of $BALD in a short period of time seems to be the work of an experienced "player" who knows the tricks of the game. It makes one wonder who is behind $BALD.

Cryptocurrency influencer @WSBChairman exposed SBF as a possible mastermind behind BALD. According to the tweet, WSBChairman said, "SBF was locked up in his parents' basement this morning, accused of creating and defrauding a shitcoin with a market cap of 100 million USD. You can't even make this stuff up." Elon Musk replied to the tweet with a simple "sigh."

A reply from the official $BALD account exposed their identity. The $BALD Twitter account tweeted, "Since deployment, I have not sold any tokens. I have only performed liquidity addition/removal and purchase operations."

Then @StealthElectron Twitter replied to the above tweet, saying, "Cool story, bro, but as you know, when you add bilateral liquidity and the price rises, AMM will sell tokens for ETH in the pool. So, yes, you actually sold a lot of tokens and now have more ETH. I'm not judging you, just clarifying things."

Bald Twitter reply "correct"

"Correct," a common everyday expression, has appeared repeatedly in SBF's Twitter replies. In a series of screenshots posted by Twitter user @smoltaleb, we found that SBF has used the word "correct" in multiple tweet replies.

 Used to using "quite well"

However, is $BALD really created by Sam Bankman-Fried? Let's see what the crypto community says.

Autism Capital: "BALD rugger may be a former member of the Serum team."

Autism Capital tweeted in response: If BALD rugger is indeed Sam Bankman-Fried, then he is truly an evil character straight out of a comic book.. He always finds a way to scam. Autism Capital believes that BALD rugger may be a former member of the Serum team.

According to consistent clues speculated by multiple crypto KOLs on Twitter, there are strong connections between the on-chain activities of $BALD deployer and SBF, including:

1) The $BALD deployer was the first voter for the sushi proposal

2) The writing style of the $BALD deployer in their tweets is similar to SBF's

3) The $BALD deployer is also the biggest DYDX farmer

Related Wallet Addresses

One of the addresses that has been sending funds to the $BALD deployer is one of the wallets triggering the UST decoupling.

Image source is from @CryptoBran_ 

The on-chain evidence provided by @Blockanalia indicates strong connections between the $BALD deployer's associated wallet addresses and Andrew Keys and Alameda Research, including interactions with every major exchange, 400 transactions with $USDT blacklisted addresses, and previous use of Wintermute otc...

@adamscochran said that the timeline also matches. This deploying account was inactive during SBF's imprisonment, and became active again after arriving in the United States. The prosecution believes that he could access other devices because the leaked Caroline diary was not on a monitored device.

On-chain detective ZachXBT tweeted today in April, "Serum Twitter has deleted all tweets, changed the profile picture to Milady, and started promoting Shitcoin." Is this just a coincidence?

"This is a conspiracy theory!"

However, Tiffany Fong, who previously interviewed SBF during his bail period, believes that this is a conspiracy theory because he can currently only use a flip phone.

"Since the change in the bail conditions in April 2023, SBF has not been able to use a mobile phone or laptop and has basically been using a flip phone without internet connectivity and a whitelist of restricted websites such as The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, Courtlistener, etc.

Attention: he cannot access Twitter, so he claims it's unlikely. And Sam has a habit of typing double spaces between sentences. Now, even visitors are subject to security checks and are prohibited from carrying external electronic devices, so SBF cannot access other laptops or devices. I know everyone loves conspiracy theories, but it seems fake to say that SBF is behind BALD」.

Even on polymarket, someone has started a betting market called "Did SBF launch BALD?". After seeing so much evidence, do you also think SBF is behind the Bald?