07-25
@_FORAB
Hashed Annual Meeting Travel Notes 1. When everyone was crazy about holding conferences, Hashed, the largest Crypto institution in South Korea, was also involved in holding a conference. It is more like an annual meeting than a conference, because it is more like a gathering of all the invested projects and LP investors. 2. There are still a few Chinese people at the scene, more than 500 people, mainly from Europe, America, Japan and South Korea. Although it is the first year, I hope there will be more Chinese faces next year. 3. Modularity, derivatives, and parallel EVM are the tracks that are generally discussed by peers at the venue. It can be felt that everyone has reached a consensus in this regard. Therefore, Monad and Bera, which have not been invested by Hashed, are also called to share with everyone. 4. It has to be said that serial entrepreneurs do have advantages in financing. Half of the co-founders present have participated in one or two phenomenal plates before, and everyone has their own story in the currency circle. 5. Although the LUNA incident caused indelible damage to Hashed and caused it to lose its No. 1 position in Asia, after regaining its momentum, it has launched more than 20 projects in the first half of this year, and indeed outperformed most institutions in terms of quantity. 6. Interestingly, although it is the largest Crypto institution in South Korea, its new offices are actually opened in Abu Dhabi and Tokyo. It may be to be closer to LPs. 7. Being the strongest regional fund means more bargaining chips at the negotiation table. Many founders who come to seek financing still think that taking over Hashed is equivalent to taking over the Korean market, even if the valuation is cut to a low level. 8. The first batch of Japanese creditors who received compensation in Mentougou have begun to become LPs of funds. Even if 5% of the 9 billion US dollars is given to the fund for management, there will be 450 million US dollars, which is enough for 5-10 funds to continue operating. 9. In addition to Hashed’s annual meeting, Solana’s Tokyo conference in August is also on the way. I don’t know whether these old men from Japanese consortiums will be lobbied to join SOL, but Tokyo this summer will definitely become more and more crowded and lively.(来源: Twitter )
07-24
@0xSunNFT
Today, lets talk about the two topics of smart money and copy trades. From the perspective of being frequently monitored and copied, I would like to share my views. The following content is mainly for the chain, and does not include areas that I am not familiar with, such as contract orders. My core point is that for most players, monitoring smart money is very meaningful, but copy trades is not necessary. First, let me briefly introduce these two concepts. Smart money refers to traders who have a deep understanding of the market and have advantages in certain aspects, while copy trades is Copytrade, which, as the name suggests, monitors other peoples transactions and follows the buying and selling through automated programs. In other words, smart money is actually players who can maintain positive returns for a period of time, and the core advantages of making money in this market are actually three points: technology, cognition, and information gap. Technology, such as sniping the opening, finding the correct contract in advance through chain information; cognition, such as judging whether a certain news has a positive or negative impact on the price, how high the ceiling of a certain narrative is, or judging the subsequent trend by analyzing the chip structure on the chain; information gap, the most common is Cabals insider information, or the source of information is one step faster than most people. Monitoring this type of wallet is very useful, because the market is very fast now, there are many projects, and it is impossible to learn about each project in advance by simply relying on Twitter and Telegram. Monitoring is a very good source of information, giving you the opportunity to learn about the project in a short time after the opening, but copying is not the case. It is not difficult to find that the technical route belongs to the winner-takes-all, and a step slower will result in much higher costs. Copying sniping or Pumpfun insider trading is basically equivalent to giving money, because a few seconds of difference will cause the purchase price to differ several times, becoming liquidity; and information asymmetry can only exist in a small range. Once it is widely spread, it is no longer an information asymmetry. Insider trading often avoids retail investors from entering the market through new wallets, violent washes, etc. These two are destined to be advantages that belong to only a very small number of people. It is more suitable for ordinary players to improve their cognition, and copying, a simple and crude imitation method, lacks this core point. You just buy and sell blindly, but you don’t know the reason at all. Another natural disadvantage of copying is that you buy more expensively than others and sell cheaper than others. In addition, there are now a large number of smart wallets that kill copying. Although I have never done this, as a wallet that has been copied since the NFT era, I am also very disgusted with copying, because a large number of non-spontaneous buy orders in a short period of time can easily destroy the original price trend and bring subsequent selling pressure, which is not conducive to the normal development of tokens. So I actually understand the behavior of killing copying. The reason I did not do this is just because some group friends are also copying my wallet. To further explain, most profitable on-chain players focus on odds rather than winning rates, often making small losses and big profits, maintaining market sensitivity through daily operations, and then striking hard when encountering truly promising opportunities. Whether the copying wallet can withstand previous losses and dare to follow orders under pressure is a difficult problem. Copying is the laziest transaction. Choosing to copy is equivalent to handing over the ownership of the wallet to others. As the saying goes, dont be someone elses Adou, be your own Zhao Yun.(来源: Twitter )
07-02
@cryptoxiao1127
The structural bull market dominated by BTC will tend more and more towards the A-share market structure. Taking Moutai as an example, the increase in the liquor sector has derived the consumer sector corresponding to BTC, which is the BTC ecosystem, which is still a sector that has not been explored.(来源: Twitter )
06-26
@Christianeth
Let’s stop criticizing Blast and stop looking at the price of coins. Let’s analyze rationally the seven sins of the genius pacman who is praised so highly. 1. He did not choose to issue coins at the best time. The market was good in March and the time was short. If he had issued the coins synchronously with the main network at this time, everyone should have made huge profits. Even the big lock holders would have worked hard without complaint. As a result, after more than three months of hard work, the market value expectation was even lower, and OKX and BN did not list it. 2. Technical inexperience is the original sin. The result of doing Infra without accumulation is that the infrastructure cannot keep up. The yield model that seemed good at the beginning was verified and found that even the basic demand of cross-chain bridge was lagging behind. The exchange could not withdraw directly, and retail investors could not come in. 3. Endless PUA, from March PUA to May, from May PUA to the end of June, and today everyone found that they will be PUA for another six months. Pinduoduo also PUA but really created value and good user experience. What are you doing with your capital plate? 4. He doesnt have a deep feeling about liquidity, probably because he has never done traditional Defi and is not a big investor (of course, he has made a fortune now), which I have talked about before. 5. He has no contractual spirit at all and directly offends all big investors. Key points: I think big investors are the group that cannot be offended in the entire currency circle. They are outnumbered so their voice is not big, and they dont have the influence of the core circle, but in fact, this group of people are the ones who support the entire chain ecology. Its very simple. The project parties may know that big investors (big leeks) are the key factors that support the currency price and ecological liquidity. For people like me who really buy millions of US dollars of altcoins for their dreams, the value may be greater than that of a hundred small investors or robots. You can fake the volume to do data for the exchange, but the real fundamentals must be supported by the 20% of big investors. 6. Objectively speaking, gold distribution is relatively decentralized, but it is still bound by small interest groups. Although I am also an investor in some of these projects, those who understand will understand. Compradors mean that the quality of ecological projects will definitely not keep up with the development of organic in the long run. 7. From a personal perspective, I found that he was irresponsible or arrogant. He came to me to schedule a call to get feedback, but he didnt show up at the agreed time (it was 1 a.m. in China at that time). I waited for an hour, but he didnt reply to my message, and there was no apology at the end. I was puzzled by this operation. Lets not talk about whether I am valuable to him or not, its really not that important, but basic respect for human beings should be there, right? In fact, there are many more, but I dont want to scold him. Investing is nothing more than knowing people, we have all been cheated, and I think I am not well-trained. In fact, many signs can be seen long ago, but it was my own logical framework and tendency to believe this that made me make mistakes. The currency may rise, but I will not eat shit again.(来源: Twitter )
06-24
@maid_crypto
The era of swindling is over. People from different groups say different things. 1. Ordinary users say: swindling can’t make money anymore, the era is over. 2. Investors say: They don’t want to use their own money to pull up the initial circulation, forcing themselves to open short hedges to cover the project party’s cashing out. 3. The project party says: They rely on swindling user data to falsify and fool investors, but they can’t fool anymore, the era is over. The consensus is broken. . One of the problems is that the Ponzi attribute of this model is too low, and it eventually becomes a pvp cut, and no one takes over. Ponzi can make everyone rich on paper, and Ponzi can attract users outside the circle. Everyone knows that Edison tested more than a hundred materials and found tungsten filaments to make light bulbs. Few people know that he had melted more than a dozen rounds before finding tungsten filaments. If he couldn’t find tungsten filaments in the end, all the more than a hundred experiments before that were Ponzi.(来源: Twitter )
06-22
@TeddyAC01
The company just held a 150-minute meeting, and I chatted with my colleagues one by one, and four and a half hours were gone. I will summarize the essence of the meeting and share it with you: (The above is the view of ACcapital, which has no investment value and is for reference only) 1. The secondary altcoins have fallen almost enough, so you can buy the bottom one after another. The big cake has not fallen through yet, so dont buy it for the time being. 2. Insufficient liquidity in the market, ETFs are all over-the-counter funds, and there is a large amount of wait-and-see funds. 3. The capital split between the East and the West is relatively serious, resulting in the inability of funds to flow back. The Sol system and Depin that the West strongly supports cannot be bought by Eastern capital, so there is no largest secondary buying order, they cannot make back their capital, and there is no way to create new hot spots. The BTC L2 inscription NFT that Eastern capital strongly supports is not favored by Western capital, resulting in no super large investors taking over, Eastern capital cannot flow back, and retail investors are not passionate enough. 4. Binance neither fully buys Western projects nor fully buys Eastern projects. Binances influence on the market is already incomparably strong. UB and CB are no longer comparable in their ability to bring buy orders in the secondary market. 5. There are a lot of people with M attributes now. They seem to feel good after scolding their colleagues all night.(来源: Twitter )
06-13
@qinbafrank
Regarding the June interest rate meeting: Keeping the policy unchanged is a cautious move. The Feds interest rate decision in the early morning was unchanged as expected by the market. There were several parts that exceeded market expectations. Here are my personal understandings: 1. Compared with the full text of the interest rate decision in early May, there are two changes: the evaluation of inflation has changed from a lack of further progress in May to modest further progress. The change in inflation wording is still very important. Another is the deletion of the specific statement on the adjustment of the balance sheet reduction plan. I was a little confused when I first saw this. Later, I thought that the QT Taper should have been clarified before, so after June, the specific implementation operation will be the responsibility of the New York Fed. Then, we can read the report disclosed by the New York Fed. 2. Regarding the dot plot that everyone pays attention to, it is indeed adjusted a lot compared with March. The dot plot shows that no one expects three interest rate cuts this year, while more than half of the officials expected at least three interest rate cuts last time. Nearly 80% of the officials expect at least one interest rate cut this time, and the number of officials who expect no interest rate cuts this year has doubled to four. At first glance, it is still very hawkish, and it seems that the message conveyed by the market is also the same. But take a closer look: among the 19 voting members, 7 believe that it is appropriate to cut interest rates once before the end of the year, 8 believe that it is necessary to cut interest rates twice, and 4 believe that there should be no rate cut this year at all - everyone is concerned about only one rate cut, which is just the median forecast of the voting members. In fact, there are more people who predict two rate cuts. From this perspective, it will be better. Lets look at a more distant forecast: it is expected that there will be one 25 basis point rate cut in 2024 (while the dot plot in March predicts three times), and it is expected that there will be four 25 basis point rate cuts in 2025 (previously expected to be three times) - in short, the number of rate cuts expected this year will decrease, and the number of rate cuts expected next year will increase. 3. Regarding economic forecasts, the Fed maintains the GDP growth forecast for this year, next year and the next three years and longer-term unchanged, and slightly raises the unemployment rate forecast for next year and the next year and longer-term by 0.1 percentage point, and raises the PCE inflation forecast and core PCE inflation forecast growth rate by 0.2 percentage points this year, and the expected growth rate of these two inflation indicators next year by 0.1 percentage point. 4. Regarding Powells press conference, I read the transcript. It feels a bit lackluster, probably because of the changes in the dot plot and economic forecasts, Powell doesnt need to say too much. Let the market digest and figure out the dot plot. How to understand the change in the Feds attitude this time? 1. My biggest feeling is that the Fed has learned a lesson and is more cautious. Why do you say that? If you have an impression, you can look back at the two meetings in the fourth quarter of last year, especially the one in early November, because inflation was weak at that time, the Fed was very optimistic and clearly put forward the expectation of interest rate cuts in 24 years (of course, the US Treasury yield reached 5% in mid-October 23, which meant that there was a liquidity shock, which also forced the Fed to express a more optimistic attitude), so that the market expectations were far ahead of the Fed, and it was believed that there would be five to six interest rate cuts in 24 years, and financial conditions were actually looser. For a highly financialized country like the United States, the market expectations are optimistic, financial conditions are substantially loosened on a large scale, risk markets are strengthening, and wealth effects are increasing, which will naturally lead to stronger consumption and services. The market strength in the fourth quarter of last year was linked to inflation in the first quarter of this year, and then rebounded after three months. The markets reflexivity once again played a role. From this perspective, the Feds caution this time is understandable. Especially last night, the May CPI came out and was lower than expected. If the Feds forecast is more optimistic at this time, then market expectations will rise again, and the situation in the fourth quarter of last year will repeat itself, which is more unfavorable to the trend of inflation in the future. At present, the driving effect of market expectations is very obvious. Under the data preference, the market expectations are optimistic, and the Fed has more reason to be cautious. After all, they dont want inflation to repeat again. This is also the reason why Powell said that most officials did not modify their forecasts at the data release conference. Being cautious is also a reverse regulation of optimistic sentiment. 2. Once bitten by a snake, you will be afraid of the rope for ten years. The Fed may intend to avoid repeating the mistake of opening champagne in advance last year. We have talked about it before. The market needs to gradually confirm the positive signals, and in fact, the Fed does the same. Especially after the lessons learned at the end of last year, we are still very vigilant about the improvement of inflation data in one month. The time window for the Fed to confirm inflation changes may be extended. The CPI in April is not stronger, and the CPI in May is not enough to confirm that inflation has reversed the rebound trend in the first quarter. We may have to look at the data in June and July. From this perspective, the dot plot mentioned earlier predicts 19 votes: 8 predict two rate cuts, 7 predict one rate cut, and 4 predict no rate cuts. There will be a lot of variables at the September interest rate meeting. 3. We have talked about this many times before. The current Federal Reserve has given up forward-looking thinking and follows the data step by step. So we just need to look at the data. In the short term, I personally think that I am still cautiously optimistic: I am optimistic because inflation was not stronger in April, it weakened across the board in May, and the unemployment rate reached a key position of 4%, which determines that there should not be a big drop; But I am cautious because the attitude of the Federal Reserve has not changed, and the market is hesitant about this. Then I also want to look at the data for one or two more months to see if inflation has really reversed the rebound trend in the first quarter. There may be more large-scale fluctuations, which requires us to be more patient and wait for new events or data to stimulate the trend.(来源: Twitter )
06-09
@hellosuoha
Lets talk about @binances launchpool @ionet next week. 1. Project fundamental analysis #DePIN‌ + #AI + #GPU 1. What is io doing; io.net is a decentralized computing network that supports the development, execution, and expansion of ML (machine learning) applications on the Solana blockchain. Leverage the worlds largest GPU clusters to allow machine learning engineers to access distributed cloud service computing power at a fraction of the cost of centralized services. Users and computing power providers participate in this process through three steps: IO Cloud: A page for deploying and managing decentralized GPU clusters; IO Worker: Provides users with real-time insights into their calculations, providing operations and a birds-eye view of devices connected to the network, allowing them to monitor these devices and perform quick operations such as deleting and renaming devices; IO Explorer: Provides a window into the inner workings of the network, such as complete visibility of network activity, important statistics, data points, and reward transactions. 2. What is IO used for; IO is the native token and protocol token of the io.net network. IO will be the main payment method in the io.net ecosystem, such as paying for GPU deployment fees. And every model deployed on io.net must perform a tiny IO transaction for inference. IO tokens are used to reward GPU contributors. (Mining output) 2. Token price prediction Total token amount: 500M, eventually inflated to 800M; Initial circulation: 95M; Financing situation: 1B valuation in the latest round of financing; According to the price prediction of the recent launchpool: If predicted by $NOT, MC will run between 500M-2.8B, and the price will fall between 5.5U-30U; If predicted by $BB, MC will run between 120M-350M, and the price will fall between 1.3U-4.2U; (basically it does not fall at this price) If predicted by $REZ, MC will run between 100M-200M, and the price will fall between 1.1U-2.4U; (basically it does not fall at this price) Therefore, it is unreasonable to use the recent Launchpool valuation to estimate the price. It is calculated based on the recent costs of friends who use A100 for mining, the costs of mining with laptops, and the costs of the latest round of financing. Since the points redemption ratio is currently unknown, it is impossible to calculate the mining costs very well. Assuming that the points are redeemed at 1:100, then $IO will need about 7u to break even. (This is still based on normal points, as many peoples points are not normal.) Based on the OTC price, it is currently 4.8u, and 5.7u on @aevoxyz, so the market has given a rough price of about 4-8u. And due to the high valuation of #DePIN‌‌ +#AI, you can look up. Look at the analysis rationally, there is no #DYOR(来源: Twitter )
06-04
@SafePalCN
⚠️Asset security is no small matter, anti-theft tips should be kept in mind1⃣ Be cautious when setting and saving passwords, and be sure to enable two-factor verification2⃣ Use a new wallet address + small assets for airdrops and activities3⃣ Put large deposits in cold wallets, and never authorize any website at will4⃣ Private keys and mnemonics should be isolated offline5⃣ Check the transfer address carefully and be wary of private chats with strangers(来源: Twitter )
06-03
@lanhubiji
Now the number of active users of Arbitrum exceeds that of Ethereum L1. According to this trend, it is highly likely that Arbitrum will surpass Ethereum L1 in a long term. At the same time, Arbitrum ranks first in terms of activity and TVL among all L2s. In addition, its support for ecological projects is indeed visible, such as the 200 million ARBs supporting its internal game ecosystem. However, these fundamentals are difficult to reflect on the price. First, the L2 pattern has not been fully determined, and there are too many L2 projects, so the market cannot fully determine the direction; Second, Arbitrum has given a lot of support to ecological projects, but the projects within the ecosystem have not directly fed back to ARB. It is indeed a bit of a waste of the potential that ARB should have just to increase the number of user interactions. The development towards a mutually supportive positive cycle is the path to sustainable development of the system economy. Third, there is no value capture in holding ARB (no staking income, no destruction, and no airdrop income from the project party...). The current situation of ARB is a bit regrettable. In fact, it has a chance to far surpass other L2s and even other public chains. What a pity.(来源: Twitter )
05-29
@TeddyAC01
As I expected, I was criticized. You forced me to expand, right? I am going to reveal all the income items of crypto VC (with a full set of incubation services) 🙂 (Company + Individual) There is no order, I will write whatever comes to mind. 1: The natural increase of BTC held by companies and individuals. Long-term crypto practitioners have a large amount of unmoved BTC in their hands (as a percentage of personal assets) 2: (Almost) lossless staking income, such as Merlin, bb, puffer, mezo, jup, etc. 3: Financing spreads, this year mainly focuses on large-scale lending of SOL. As investors and guarantors, we provide a large amount of SOL to the SOL local dog market maker as the LP pool 4: Mainstream public chain node staking rewards, including external rewards and additional individual rewards of the public chain 5: Trading income, divided into mainstream projects/NFT/inscriptions, generally speaking, it is the dealer income 6: Economic model design, market value strategy services, market value strategy implementation services, generally speaking, it is the service fee of MM company 7: Project full-case marketing planning/operation/listing services, generally speaking, it is the core profit point of labs 8: Mortgage lending services, generally speaking, it is usury in the circle, in the form of individual to individual, the vacant USDT is lent to large miners at high interest rates, and the main income is the transfer of BTC due to violent market fluctuations 9: Secondary income brought by media/public opinion manipulation. Generally speaking, it means interfering with the media/marketing service providers/KOL matrix under certain funds as a shareholder, artificially creating traffic hotspots, and then intervening in the secondary market to eat both futures and cash. 10: Perpetual contract rate arbitrage 11: As an LP of multiple primary/secondary funds, investors income is received regularly 12: Control the speed of information transmission, and monopolize the packaging service income of projects in a single country (region) 13: The companys normal investment income 14: Secondary hot money income 15: Secondary retail investor income 16: Management period and target income spread arbitrage between the traditional financing market and the crypto financing market 17: Consultant income, usually instructing the boss of the telephone project party on the precautions for doing the project. The main purpose is to make friends. The income value fluctuates greatly, ranging from a few thousand U to hundreds of thousands of U, and the service time is usually less than one hour 18: Sub-brand project pipeline income 19: Marketing income of the subordinate community, etc. If you think of anything else, please add it(来源: Twitter )
05-27
@lanhubiji
Waiting is one of the skills that seems simple but is difficult to learn in the investment process. It is long, boring, without light, and even ridiculed. It is rare to be able to remain calm during such a process.(来源: Twitter )
05-21
@xingpt
Binance’s announcement is very timely. I hope that more projects with medium and low valuations can be listed... Pros: 1. Projects with good fundamentals and low valuations in recent financing 2. Angels, VCs and incubators that can invest in projects with low valuations Cons: 1. Late-stage VCs that take over projects with high valuations, BN will no longer provide a guarantee for projects with overvalued valuations 2. Competition for early-stage investment is more intense. The future model is not for project parties to raise hundreds of millions of dollars in rounds, but to raise a seed round and go directly to the exchange, and the listing cycle is rapidly shortened...(来源: Twitter )
05-16
@YeruiZhang
Here are a few opinions that may not be correct, just for discussion. I hope you can give me some advice. The emergence of http://Pump.fun is the end of Sol’s Tugou season. It feels like Blur to ETH NFT. 1. http://Pump.fun reduces the tradable range of SOL Tugou from 1M to 100M to 50K to 5M. Although there are successful cases such as Michi, my understanding is that Meme will choose to highly control the market in the early stage + wash out the floating chips, and then establish consensus through methods such as pulling the market/locking the pool. Using http://Pump.fun to issue means that it will be seen by the community earlier, the starting point of the game is lower, and the difficulty of early control is increased. It is also difficult to build a large pool. http://2.Pump.fun has basically dominated the issuance of early Meme. At present, the daily income of the platform can reach up to 1M. If the potential Golden Dog is released in advance, there will be hundreds or thousands of the same name. Users who buy the wrong coin will consume the subsequent acceptance emotions. I will throw out this point of view first. I have a few ideas but I haven’t found any arguments yet. Of course, I hardly made any money on http://Pump.fun, so if you are any expert, please help me.(来源: Twitter )
05-15
@nake13
⭐️ What kind of sparks can Web3 + Game + AI Agent create? Last week, the @BladeofgodX team announced that it had received investments from Delphi, OKX, YGG and Longhash. I happened to talk to them about the application scenarios of AI Agent in games. They also emphasized a new concept called Agents as a Service. 1️⃣ Transformation from Web2 The development team behind Void Labs has entered the game industry since 2006. I have also seen an interview with their Co-Founder @TniseVoidLabs by a B station Up master. They said that the maturity of blockchain technology just provides a new business model and user interaction method for the game field, and its decentralized nature breaks through the geographical and platform restrictions of traditional games, allowing global players to play in a fair and transparent environment. Moreover, with the development of AI technology, production relations have been redefined, and the traditional currency system is no longer applicable to the new production relations. Blade of God X itself is an action role-playing game that incorporates the elements of Norse mythology Cthulhu and adopts a soul-style gameplay. 2️⃣ AI Agent: Optimized to run directly on mobile devices In the Blade of God X game, the behavior and decision-making of AI Agents can be controlled by models of different sizes. Small models handle simple tasks such as combat actions, while large models are responsible for more complex strategies and decisions. They introduced the concept of reinforcement training, which supports AIs behavioral decisions through a set of neural networks, improves AIs autonomy and efficiency, and makes the game content less predictable and exploitable by players. After the reinforcement training is completed, Blade of God X will also use vision and language as input, so that AI can more accurately identify and understand the game environment, which can enhance the immersive experience of the game. In order to reduce the burden on the server and significantly reduce the response time, the optimized AI can run directly on the GPU of the users mobile device. 3️⃣ Agents as a Service: Digital twins are different from the previous single enhancement of AI strength through machine learning. Void Labs also proposed a new concept Agents as a Service. They said that in the Agents as a Service mode, AI Agents can not only play an auxiliary role when the player is online, but also continue the game as their digital twins AI Twins when the player is offline. That is to say, the players AI Agent will be highly similar to the player in terms of thinking style and processing ability. In addition, through blockchain technology, Blade of God X can ensure that the activities of AI Agents are transparent and verifiable, and can generate real economic value for players. The studio also revealed that it plans to develop a more complex and interactive Group AI Agents function in the next generation of AI Agent systems, so that AIs can cooperate and compete with each other. The core of Agents as a Service is to use VLA (Visual Language Action) based on large language models for intensive training. This method combines the three dimensions of vision, language and action, which can not only help AI better identify objects and scenes in the game, interpret and execute player text instructions, but also enable it to determine its behavior in the game based on visual and language input. 4️⃣ Recent progress: AI Agents will be fully deployed soon The first round of Alpha testing of Blade of God X ended at the end of March and received a rating of 5.0 in the Epic Store Alpha test. They will fully deploy AI Agents in the upcoming second round of testing, allowing players to interact with them in more than ten different scenarios. Finally, they emphasized that the exploration of AI Agent is not limited to the current stage, and the ultimate goal is to make AI an intelligent agent that can parse game engines and logic. These AIs will be able to use user-generated content tools and game engines to create new game modes and rules.(来源: Twitter )
05-10
@YeruiZhang
Today, lets talk about Bouncebit, a new project on Binance. At present, BTC layer2 has been divided into two ways of playing. One is the technical flow, which is to ensure the security of assets through various technologies, such as Babylons decentralized staking system, and Bontenix uses a group of rotating nodes to form a spider-like node network to ensure the security of Layer2. The characteristics of this type consider decentralization and technical optimization from the perspective of the public chain, similar to the Infra project of ETH and other chains that turns the projects own tokens into assets; the other is the asset flow, which is essentially to add yield to the existing BTC. Bouncebit is the most stable one, using centralized exchanges to arbitrage to obtain the currency-based yield as the bottom layer, and then issuing corresponding bills for use on Layer2. Compared with the yield through the ecosystem, the yield of this model will be more stable, and the corresponding growth rate in TVL will be slower, but the advantage is that the debt owed to TVL and the rise and fall of the ecosystem is less. Bouncebit is not a purely technical project. On the one hand, most of the Dapps on the chain are deployed under a licensing system, and they do not emphasize technological innovation, but rather provide users with stable arbitrage income + stable ecological income. Another feature of this passive model similar to CEFI is that the participation threshold is low. Users only need to deposit money to obtain stable and long-term income, which is naturally similar to Binances Megadrop. Megadrop is an alternative way to play. Users obtain the quota of IDO projects by regularly depositing BNB and completing tasks, which does not conflict with the quota acquisition of Luanchpad. For users, projects under this model require BNB to pledge for a long time, and the corresponding percentage of tokens that can be provided to pledgers is high. The corresponding MC/FDV will not be as high as the traditional Infra project, and the look and feel will be better. For Binance, some users who do tasks can increase the use of Web3 wallets and can give BNB Holders a relatively stable rate of return. The total amount of Bouncebit is 2.1 billion, with 19.5% at the opening, 8% for Megadrop, and the rest including 4% airdrop, 3% MM and part of the ecological reserve (about 4.5%). If we estimate based on the two rounds of financing, which totals 21%, and the first round of financing is 6M, the average financing valuation should not exceed 80M (calculated based on 10%@60M in the first round of financing and 11%@100M in the second round of financing). The price calculation in the previous period was quite different, so I will not estimate it this time.(来源: Twitter )
05-09
@xingpt
In this round of bull market cycle, the biggest theme is still infrastructure Infra, and there is a collective lack of application layer projects. Of course, there are endogenous factors, such as the imperfect infrastructure of crypto, the short falsification cycle of the application layer, etc. But the more core problem is that there is no increment, and the source of the lack of increment is the tightening regulatory environment. Major markets such as the United States have knocked all non-compliant exchanges through the case of BN. Compared with the last round, before the collapse of FTX, almost all overseas exchanges, including BN, could be accessed smoothly in the United States. A certain country in the East has been tightening up after 19 years, and has continued to make concessions after 22 years, and ground promotion is basically impossible. The leeks in South Korea and Turkey should have been cut. There are two possibilities in the future: First, the supervision continues to be strict, and crypto continues to pvp on the market. In this case, for secondary investment, I suggest that ordinary people only play Bitcoin, funds do quantitative currency standard enhancement, and smart money and dealers continue to play meme; the core institutions in the primary market cooperate with large exchanges to change the form of packaging projects. If small and medium-sized funds are not to be harvested, they must change the pure financial investment approach and become a community of interests with the project party, participate in distribution as a traffic distribution channel, or create a delivery model and channel (this is why KOL is better than general VC terms, because it can help sell goods). If the pvp situation continues, or the market diverges, such as Bitcoins new high, but the effect of copycat listing is seriously insufficient, so that the new coins of large exchanges continue to break. Primary investment can focus on asset distribution platforms that can create endogenous profits, and the logic is similar to investing in Pinduoduo during an economic downturn. The variable is that the election change in the United States and the settlement of the FTX incident have the opportunity to make the United States begin to loosen its high-pressure regulation on crypto. In addition, the new incremental market is superimposed on the interest rate cut cycle, and perhaps some emerging markets can have individual explosive projects. Second, if the regulatory wind direction begins to loosen, it is a good opportunity to vigorously increase positions and configure new trading venues (such as FTX in 2019 and Uni in 2020) and new types of applications. In a huge bubble cycle, we should hype up the most Ponzi model, hype up the next algorithmic stablecoin Luna/OHM, and hype up the next game Gamefi.(来源: Twitter )
05-06
@LeePima
Some data I saw during the holiday: 1/ In the past two weeks, 14,000 new tokens were issued on SOL every day 2/ Most of the new tokens occurred on Pump, and 600,000 tokens were issued in 45 days 3/ At present, Pump’s annualized revenue has reached 128 million US dollars, entering the ranks of unicorns Thought one: If you don’t have the energy to study so many new tokens, then the logic will sink: the more tokens are issued, the more transactions there are, and the more conducive it is to DEX= $JUP, MEV= $JTO, and the bottom-level revenue capture is real Thought two: The bottom level is still $SOL. The formation of the trend is like a rumbling train. A few small bumps will not change the trend of the train. The scale effect will only snowball and grow bigger, all the way north Thought three: New consumption and new retail groups such as Pump also have social attributes, integrating transactions and social interaction. The monetization of WEB2 is advertising and shopping (transactions), and the monetization of WEB3 is also transactions. Therefore, in WEB3, whether it is social or live broadcast, similar to Telegram Bot Well, trading is the only way to generate revenue, and we also look forward to the new interaction method of Pump/$Friend to release more potential and possibilities.(来源: Twitter )
04-28
@jianshubiji
Mainnet GAS hits a new low, a good opportunity to activate boutique wallets👀 Mainnet high-quality TX interactive reference👇 1️⃣Register/purchase ENS and set an avatar2️⃣Create Safe multi-signature3️⃣List NFT on Opensea/blur4️⃣Buy some UNI and ENS on Uniswap to participate in governance5️⃣Approve a token of a certain protocol6️⃣Revoke to cancel the authorization of a certain token8️⃣ETH pledge of high-quality projects such as Eigenlayer\Zircut\Swell9️⃣Mint free NFT on http://mint.fun 🔟ZK-era\Linea\Scroll and other official bridges(来源: Twitter )
04-22
@Deibajie
Runes have always been criticized. Some people say that the technology has not been updated, the name is too long and not easy to cx, and the gameplay is as boring as brc20! Refutation: 1. If you want technology, you can play atom, why play runes and brc20? 2. The name is too long. Do you think foreigners will like it? All coins had short names before. Isn’t it an innovation to change it to a long name? 3. The gameplay is still not innovative because you have played brc20, so you think runes are boring, but foreigners have not played it, so they will find it very interesting! 4. The last point, the strong will always be strong! If you want to play, play the leader and the second dragon. Other liquidity will be a mess. At least the leader is trapped and wait for ath!(来源: Twitter )