Original | Odaily Planet Daily ( @OdailyChina )
By Wenser ( @wenser 2010 )
If someone told you that they could predict the market trend 100% of the time, would you believe it?
I don't believe it, but such individuals do exist. Over the past 10 days, a certain whale has accurately predicted every recent market turn, even achieving 12 consecutive wins and accumulating profits exceeding $12.6 million. The key to his success is always closely tied to US President Trump's public statements and other actions . It's no wonder that many speculate that this whale has close ties with members of Trump's faction. Furthermore, there are more than one such "insider whales," including one who profited nearly $200 million by short-selling during the "October 11th crash."
Odaily Planet Daily will briefly analyze the major insider whale operations and the suspected identities behind them in this article for readers' reference.
Crypto whales are appearing frequently. Are they white gloves or insiders behind them?
It is worth mentioning that the difference between this "crypto whale suspicion" and the usual ones is that:
First, the insider address is no longer a single one, but multiple addresses may have insider trading operations;
Second, the insider whale-related addresses not only chose Hyperliquid to open orders and make profits, but also bet on some related events on the prediction market Polymarket.
A look at the insider whale address information, someone successfully achieved a "12-game winning streak"
Unlike the "Hyperliquid 50x leveraged whale" @qwatio , mentioned in our previous article "Hyperliquid: A New Whale's Public Show: Trading Power and Attention Converge Again," recent insider whale trading has been more frequent and bolder. Furthermore, the timing of many of these whales' trades has been highly coincidental, often coinciding with Trump's public speeches, which is why the market currently speculates that insider trading is highly likely.
Specifically, the current "Conspicuous Package" insider whale addresses are divided into the following three categories:
The first one is the address 0xb317D2BC2D3d2Df5Fa441B5bAE0AB9d8b07283ae. We previously introduced the details in the article "The Big Whale Bayonet Fight Behind the Biggest Liquidation Day in Crypto History: Air Force Drinks and Leaves the Table with Knives" , so we will not repeat it here.
The second is the associated address 0x2ea18c23f72a4b6172c55b411823cdc5335923f4; this address closed a short position of nearly 30,000 ETH on October 11, with a profit of approximately US$72.32 million.
The above addresses all deposited funds on October 10th, opened large short positions on the eve of Trump's announcement of the negative news on tariffs, and closed their positions in batches on the 11th to take profits.
The third is 0xc2a30212a8DdAc9e123944d6e29FADdCe994E5f2. According to on-chain analyst Ai Yi, this whale has achieved 12 consecutive wins since October 14th, accumulating $12.634 million in profits. The most recent profit occurred early this morning. Influenced by the news of the meeting between the Chinese and US heads of state, BTC briefly broke through $111,000. This whale closed its long positions in BTC, ETH, and SOL, making a total profit of $1.774 million, including $1.271 million in BTC, $357,000 in ETH, and $146,000 in SOL.
Insider whales open up a new battlefield. Can Polymarket also maintain stable profits?
In addition to on-chain Perp DEX platforms such as Hyperliquid, insider whales are also suspected of finding the "wealth code" in prediction markets such as Polymarket.
Last night, as the Wall Street Journal reported that CZ had been pardoned by Trump, Polymarket's related bets were quickly settled.
According to Polymarket data, the account "bigwinner01," associated with Hyperliquid whale Garrett Jin, began betting on "Trump will pardon CZ" on September 28th, investing a total of $28,677.33 and profiting $56,824.32, a near-100% profit rate. This story was also confirmed by the well-known YouTuber and investigative journalist Coffeezilla.
It has to be said that in front of powerful people who have access to key information and can change the situation at will, retail investors have once again become the "leeks" that are harvested one-way due to information asymmetry.
The insider's identity is in doubt: Is Garrett Jin just a front-office figure? Is WLFI's co-founder the mastermind behind the scenes?
As for the true identity of the insider whale, based on the existing information, it may eventually point to the co-founder of the WLFI team and Trump’s youngest son Barron.
Disclosed information: Garrett Jin is the front-end whale
Previously, the community speculated that the whale who opened a huge short order on Hyperliquid three days in advance and made a profit of $200 million was suspected to be Bitforex co-founder Garrett Jin. The reason was that the whale's address was previously connected to Garrett Jin. Last month, an address that directly received ETH gas from the whale sent 40,000 USDT to Garrett Jin.
Chain Detective Eye subsequently published a post confirming that this speculation was highly likely, citing the fact that "Garrett Jin immediately modified his Telegram privacy settings after the post was exposed, hiding his previously public photos and phone number. He also deleted @XHash_com from his profile, just as he had removed that information from his X profile after @emmettgallic's post was exposed."
On-chain analyst MLM later published a post arguing that the whale selling over $4.23 billion in BTC for ETH was Garrett Jin, but also raised some questions. These included: Why did Garrett reveal his identity through the ENS domain? Why did CZ personally post to verify the authenticity of the information? Since he used Binance, KYC should have been able to verify this information. Finally, how could a "working man" have billions in BTC assets?
On October 13, Garrett Jin responded directly to market rumors , clarifying that he had no relationship with the Trump family or Trump Jr. - this was not insider trading; the relevant funds did not belong to him, but were client assets, for whom he ran nodes and provided internal research and insights.
Of course, the market doesn't buy it.
Is the big boss behind the insider whale the co-founder of WLFI?
On October 14th, Chain Detective Eye published an article regarding the "insider whale trading" incident, stating that sources revealed that Garret Jin may not be the primary operator, but rather a front for an insider organization. The source of information may be an insider who has been trading on White House rumors and policy announcements. This information was allegedly passed by aides close to the US presidential team to a group of traders with privileged information, who used it to establish favorable positions in advance. The key individuals currently implicated are Zach Witkoff and Chase Herro, and Trump's eldest son has also been linked to the incident.
Finally, Eye emphasized: "For personal safety reasons, this is the last report I will issue on this incident."
It can be seen that even the most experienced chain detectives know that the waters here are very deep and have reached a point where they have no control over it.
What is intriguing is that just before and after the insider whales took profits, Trump's youngest son, Barron, who is also a co-founder of WLFI, bought a super yacht worth $500 million in a high-profile manner. Therefore, there are rumors in the market that the crypto market users who suffered losses in the market may have paid the price.
Conclusion: In the crypto market, insider information never sleeps
What is certain is that the recent whale trading operations are not the first, nor will they be the last, by insiders. In the volatile crypto market, insider information is always highly sought after. However, it is the users who ultimately pay the price.
To a certain extent, when Trump became a political and business figure who was both a referee and an athlete, the outcome was already doomed.
- 核心观点:巨鲸精准交易疑涉特朗普内幕消息。
- 关键要素:
- 某地址12连胜获利1260万美元。
- 多个地址同步操作与特朗普声明时间重合。
- 关联Polymarket押注特朗普特赦CZ事件。
- 市场影响:加剧市场对信息不透明的担忧。
- 时效性标注:短期影响


