Odaily News SBFs defense team alleged in a filing late Friday that some juror questions asked by the U.S. Department of Justice could lead to bias and make jurors think SBF is guilty before the trial begins. Specifically, the defense team argued that omitting the word allegedly when describing SBFs alleged crimes improperly suggested that Bankman-Frieds fraud was an established fact. Other questions were too limited and may not reveal anything to potential jurors. Whether you are inclined to agree with the prosecutors point of view. (CoinDesk)