BTC
ETH
HTX
SOL
BNB
View Market
简中
繁中
English
日本語
한국어
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt

An article discussing the community culture of Ethereum: Don't take yourself too seriously?

ECN以太坊中国
特邀专栏作者
This article is about 2373 words, reading the full article takes about 4 minutes
Does the community culture of Ethereum not take itself seriously?
AI Summary
Expand
Does the community culture of Ethereum not take itself seriously?

Source | @technocrypto

Author | Jeff Coleman

Translator's Note: As one of the largest public chains in the community, Ethereum, what is the first thing you think of when talking about its community culture? Developer Jeff Coleman shared his views on Twitter. You may wish to go to the forum to discuss: https://weeth.io/t/topic/144

Some thoughts on Ethereum culture: One of my favorite things about the #Ethereum community is that we don't take ourselves too seriously. This is an underrated feature that deserves protection. Why?

Because it creates openness and makes it easier for people to enter a neighborhood for the first time. Everyone starts from scratch, so if every little fact you don't know is a big problem, then you won't be able to incrementally build skills and acquire knowledge, you'll just fall off a cliff with one misstep.

As the blockchain space grows, Ethereum will also use knowledge gained from other chains to drive development. Important PoS components first deployed by #Zcash. At first, everyone was not sure about the role of EIP-1559. But seeing it running in a production-grade implementation on #Filecoin boosted confidence. There are many other similar examples.

But if "don't take yourself too seriously" is the only criterion, #Dogecoin will easily beat Ethereum 😂. What's interesting about Ethereum is that it combines this open/friendly aspect with a "geeky" love of optimizing and improving the technology.

In this regard, Ethereum can be seen as a hybrid of #Bitcoin and #Dogecoin community norms. On the one hand, Ethereum is derived from the concept of Bitcoin, but on the other hand, Ethereum welcomes different people and ideas, rather than keeping them out.

For this combination of two different foundations to work, two key pieces are needed. The first is legibility. No matter how deep the Ethereum development community understands a topic, what they bring to our average community members must be more applicable to a broad understanding.

This prerequisite faces significant challenges in the transition to rollup, PoS, and sharding. The technology required to make all of this work is more complex than most previous ethereum improvements, despite the fact that these goals already exist.

If you’re reading this post and are stuck trying to understand Ethereum’s intricacies, good news: Your inexperience with dealing with these intricacies is a great community resource for building readability!

Choose what you don't understand to read (I recommend http://Ethereum.org for beginners, http://github.com/ethereum/annotated-spec… for intermediate learners, and the forum http:/ for advanced learners /ethresear.ch), write down what you understand and what you don't! We won't bite you 😜

I'm sure you'll find that as long as you stick to the norm of honesty and openness (e.g. posting a disclaimer up front that you're still learning), you'll find plenty of community members willing to read and answer your questions.

This learning is not a one-way street from the ivory tower to the masses. This is how the knowledge ramp is built, and your ideas, feedback, have real value to those who understand better. This is why the community thrives and it's how new experts are born!

The second key component of the marriage between ease and rigor in conservation is the accompanying technical and social infrastructure. I'm talking about all the other tools, websites, people, etc. that are necessary to make everything that sounds fancy matter.

This is an area where Ethereum needs to work hard. Can all these latest PoS, zero-knowledge, consensus things really promote the creation of a public decentralized infrastructure for this planet in the real world, or is it just a short-sighted practice of the technical elite? The difference between the two is how long, smoothly, and financially these features get between the strong control of Ethereum research and users first wondering "what the hell is Ethereum for?" Support, what are the financial barriers to entry, and whether there is ongoing effort to implement these features.

Those of you who have been paying attention throughout the history of Ethereum know that people like @tayvano_, @hudsonjameson, @poojaranjan19, @0xstark and many, many others have continued to put in labor and not get the credit it deserves, but that's what they take on" That's it", "just click", "won't crash", "won't explode" or "appear when you panic search" and so on, and these are often the key tasks of the success or failure of the Ethereum community. Work is more important than most people understand.

Yes, the community does something to identify and support these critical but "non-core" works (like @gitcoin), but often the crux of the matter is: do you thank these people? Did you pay these people? Did you listen to them? Do you take their work for granted? Are you emulating them?

If you're new to the community, you don't have to be a god-level expert in technology and/or human relations to assist the community. Have you helped a confused person on social media? The entire Internet is the front of Ethereum!

For every "obvious" question you answer patiently, one less person will join the queue that needs help most, indirectly or directly. Instead, documenting and sharing a problem that someone more experienced has helped you with once can also provide valuable search material for others who come after you. Developers, this is also a rich opportunity that cannot be ignored. Here, there are still a lot of needs in terms of tools, documentation and troubleshooting. You don’t need to look too much to find some neglected corners. In these places, you only need to rely on simple curiosity, responsibility and persistence (some Time is thankless), and it can really have a substantial impact. These cutting-edge fields have a much larger surface area than you might imagine.

However, if I had to find one place that needs to be infused with these Ethereum cultural values ​​right now, it would have to be the staking pool model. 32 ETH is a huge economic threshold, not only for most people living in rich countries, but for almost everyone.

Much has been said in theory about how to raise this bar trustlessly, and after we've had the beacon chain up and running for almost a full year, the actual implementation is still far behind. We can no longer stay at "yes, someone is doing this", but should mobilize people from the entire spectrum of Ethereum to participate in solving this problem. We need to make it the center of our conversations and roadmaps. In my opinion, a healthy staking pool model is a prerequisite for merging and preventing the emergence of "staking elites".

There needs to be a step-by-step, fully pre-programmed instruction on http://Ethereum.org that tells anyone how to stake with roughly $100 or less. Let's make it a reality and protect what we've worked so hard to build.

Directing people to trusted staking pools is not only sad, it is a betrayal of the fundamental values ​​of our community. We need to fix this.

ETH
public chain
Welcome to Join Odaily Official Community