Hai tuần qua, hơn 2,2 tỷ USD rút khỏi các quỹ ETF Bitcoin. Ai đang rút lui sau biến động lớn?

Overview

In May 2026, US spot Bitcoin ETFs experienced one of the most severe capital withdrawal waves since their launch. Over two weeks, net outflows exceeded $2.26 billion, putting downward pressure on Bitcoin's price, which fell to around the $74,300 region. This is not simple short-term volatility—with the Harvard endowment fund reducing its position by 43% and BlackRock's flagship product losing over $400 million in a single day, institutional-level signals are compounding. The market is reassessing the depth and sustainability of this "institutional rally."

Key Takeaways

US spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded net outflows of approximately $2.26 billion in the two weeks ending May 23, 2026, marking one of the deepest single-round pullbacks since their launch in January 2024.

A single-day outflow of $649 million on May 18 was the third-largest net redemption day of the year, with BlackRock's IBIT accounting for $448 million.

Harvard University's endowment fund cut its IBIT holdings by 43% in Q1 2026 and completely liquidated its Ethereum ETF position.

Rising US Treasury yields, higher-than-expected inflation data, and growing expectations of Fed rate hikes constitute the primary macro drivers behind this capital retreat.

Bitcoin found support in the $74,000 to $77,000 range, but analysts warn that if this zone is lost, the next line of defense sits at $70,000.

Meanwhile, Abu Dhabi sovereign fund Mubadala increased its IBIT holdings to approximately $566 million during the same period, highlighting a clear divergence among institutional players.

What Does the $2.26 Billion Outflow Mean?

The magnitude of this capital needs to be understood in context. Since the approval of US spot Bitcoin ETFs in January 2024, these products have accumulated over $57.1 billion in net inflows, with total assets under management (AUM) once approaching $99 billion. According to a report by The Block, net outflows from spot Bitcoin ETFs reached $1.26 billion in the week of May 15 to May 23 alone, the largest single-week withdrawal since late January 2026.

Combined with the approximately $1 billion in outflows from the previous week, the total net outflow over two weeks exceeded $2.26 billion. Analysis from COINOTAG indicates that these 11 US spot Bitcoin ETFs bore the most concentrated redemption pressure during this period, causing Bitcoin's price to drop to around $74,300.

However, it's also worth noting: even after the worst single-day outflow, BlackRock's IBIT still held $61.1 billion in net assets. The overall asset scale of the ETF system did not collapse. As analysts at Investing.com pointed out, the $649 million single-day outflow represented about 0.76% of total AUM at the time. It doesn't constitute a systemic collapse, but it is a signal worth monitoring.

Who is Withdrawing, and Who is Accumulating?

The main actors in this outflow round are clear.

BlackRock's IBIT was the single product with the largest redemptions. According to data from Bitcoin.com, on May 18 alone, IBIT saw $448 million in outflows, while the Ethereum ETF ETHA experienced $55.4 million in outflows the same day, marking one of the largest single-day redemptions of the year.

At the institutional level, the moves by Harvard University's endowment fund drew particular attention. SEC 13F filings show that Harvard Management Company (HMC) reduced its IBIT holdings from approximately 5.35 million shares to about 3.04 million shares in Q1 2026, a 43% decrease involving roughly $117 million. Simultaneously, the fund fully liquidated its position in BlackRock's Ethereum ETF (ETHA), worth about $86.8 million. Citing a report from Fortune via TechFlow, this marks Harvard's third consecutive quarter of reducing crypto ETF exposure.

However, not all institutions chose the same direction. Analysis from Cryptopolitan notes that during the same period Harvard was reducing its position, the Abu Dhabi sovereign wealth fund Mubadala increased its IBIT holdings counter-cyclically to approximately $566 million, marking its seventh consecutive quarter of increasing its position. This divergence itself is telling: the market simultaneously holds diametrically opposed views on the same asset, and both judgments come from "smart money."

Triple Macro Pressure: Why Institutions Are Retreating Now

The narrative of capital outflows cannot be separated from the macro background.

Inflation and Interest Rate Expectations. Analysis from FXStreet shows that the US CPI rose 3.8% year-over-year, exceeding market expectations. Concurrently, the 10-year US Treasury yield continued to climb, and the market began pricing in the possibility of a rate hike before year-end. A high-interest-rate environment compresses the valuation space for risk assets, and Bitcoin, as a "high-beta asset," bears the brunt.

Technical Resistance Unbroken. After touching $79,052 on May 16, Bitcoin failed to break through the 200-day moving average (around $82,000). K33 Research believes this adjustment is more related to broader macro headwinds than a structural bear market, but negative funding rates and weakening leverage conditions indicate market momentum is fading. Market maker Wintermute warns that if Bitcoin breaks below $75,000, the next target could be $70,000.

Regulatory Uncertainty. Investing.com notes that the SEC's delay in approving the tokenized stock "innovative exemption" plan wiped out recent regulatory expectations, triggering a loss of approximately $33.8 billion in Bitcoin's market cap. The US Senate Banking Committee advanced the CLARITY Act with a 15-9 vote, classifying Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, and XRP as digital commodities, but market reaction to this has been mixed.

$74,000: Defense Line or Trap?

At the price level, the $74,000 to $77,000 range is currently viewed by multiple institutions as a critical support zone.

Technical analysis from Investing.com points out that if Bitcoin breaks below $76,000 effectively, the next defensible level is $74,000. If that level is lost, $70,000 becomes the next major test target. Meanwhile, analysis from IG International defines the $73,757 to $74,441 zone as a key area between historical highs and previous lows.

However, some analysts hold the opposite view. COINOTAG cites on-chain sentiment analysis suggesting that ETF redemptions often reflect pessimistic expectations at the retail level, rather than structural retreat by institutions. Historically, sustained ETF redemption periods are often followed by accumulation opportunities favorable to patient holders. This logic is predicated on the macro environment stabilizing before bond yields further suffocate risk assets.

The Situation is Worse for Ethereum ETFs

This round of outflows isn't just a Bitcoin story.

Data from The Block shows that the nine spot Ethereum ETFs recorded net outflows for ten consecutive trading days during the same period, the longest streak of outflows since March 2025, with total weekly outflows of about $216 million. The net assets of ETHA, BlackRock's counterpart to IBIT for Ethereum, have fallen to a perilous edge, with remaining cumulative net inflows of only $223 million.

For investors holding or monitoring ETH assets, the structural weakness of Ethereum ETFs warrants independent assessment. View real-time depth and capital flows for Ethereum on MEXC to track market movements.

Exclusive Insights from the MEXC Crypto Pulse Research Team

This concentrated outflow from Bitcoin ETFs represents the most direct stress test for the "institutional narrative" since 2024. Our research team offers the following assessments:

This is not the collapse of institutional belief, but a reset of risk parameters. The $2.26 billion outflow sounds alarming, but it must be compared against the baseline of $57.1 billion in cumulative net inflows. Mubadala's accumulation concurrent with Harvard's withdrawal shows that the same asset yields completely different conclusions in the risk models of different institutions. This itself is a sign of market maturation, not a crisis signal.

The defense or loss of the $74,000 to $77,000 range will determine the narrative direction for the coming weeks. If Bitcoin can stabilize and halt its decline within this range, coupled with the still-high level of total ETF AUM, the foundation for the next rebound has not disappeared. If it breaks down, the liquidity cluster around $70,000 will face a true test, and obvious repricing behavior will emerge at the institutional level.

The core macro variable remains the Federal Reserve. Current inflation data has led the market to discuss the possibility of a rate hike by year-end. This is the fundamental reason for the pressure on Bitcoin beyond technical factors. If inflation data in June or July shows a substantial decline, ETF capital flows could reverse rapidly.

The structural value of the ETF products themselves remains unchanged. Harvard's reduction more likely reflects its internal leadership transition and risk model adjustments, rather than a fundamental denial of Bitcoin's long-term value. For investors looking to position in Bitcoin, this current range offers a more attractive entry point compared to the historic highs of February.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q1: Does the Bitcoin spot ETF outflow mean institutions have abandoned Bitcoin?

Not entirely. The $2.26 billion in outflows represents a partial pullback relative to the $57.1 billion in cumulative net inflows. The simultaneous position reduction by Harvard and accumulation by Mubadala indicate divergent judgments on Bitcoin within the institutional sphere, not a unanimous bearish view.

Q2: What is the main reason for Bitcoin's price drop this round?

The core driver comes from the macro environment: US CPI exceeding expectations, the 10-year Treasury yield climbing, and the market repricing the possibility of a Fed rate hike, collectively suppressing risk assets. ETF outflows and the price decline formed a mutually reinforcing negative feedback loop, accelerating the downturn.

Q3: Is $74,000 a strong support level?

Multiple institutional analysts define the $74,000 to $77,000 as a critical zone. A breakdown below this range could trigger widespread stop-losses, pushing prices toward $70,000. However, on-chain data shows that long-term holders' coins have not yet been distributed on a large scale, providing some support for the bottom.

Q4: Is the situation for Ethereum ETFs worse than for Bitcoin?

In terms of outflow duration, yes. Ethereum ETFs recorded net outflows for ten consecutive trading days, nearly double the consecutive outflow days for Bitcoin ETFs over the same period. Harvard's complete liquidation of its Ethereum ETF position also puts ETH under greater institutional confidence pressure than BTC.

Q5: How should ordinary investors respond now?

Periods of high market volatility represent important windows for systematic positioning and position management, rather than times for blind bottom-fishing or panic flight. It is recommended to use MEXC's real-time data tools to track ETF capital flows, on-chain distribution, and macro indicators, and make decisions based on sufficient information support. This article does not constitute any investment advice.

Disclaimer

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute any investment advice, financial advice, or trading guidance. The cryptocurrency market is highly volatile, and investment carries significant risks, including the potential loss of principal. Readers should conduct their own due diligence and consult with a professional financial advisor before making any investment decisions. The MEXC Crypto Pulse team assumes no responsibility for any losses incurred by relying on the content of this article.