DeFi still has a lot of room for innovation, and there will be high-quality projects in the future

A guest who shared in the event impressed me deeply. She is a senior investor in the industry. Not only did her team participate in the early investment of almost all well-known DeFi projects, but even the earlier BNB launch, FTX exchange Her team was involved in the starters.

We can guess the amazing rate of return just by looking at the comparison between the current price of these project tokens and the original price.

When she participated in the roundtable forum, she shared her views on the current hot spots:

She believes that DeFi will always be the focus of her attention, because there is still a lot of room for innovation in DeFi, and there will be good projects in the future.

She also participated in NFT very early, but she also expressed concern about the high price of some investment products in the NFT field. Her suggestion to ordinary investors is that if you want to invest in certain NFTs, you must choose those you really like, and the price is not too high.

also,

also,As far as overall investment is concerned, regardless of whether it is DeFi or NFT, she suggests that when investors who are new to the market choose projects, it is best to choose projects invested by some large institutions, because at least these projects have been screened by large institutions.

On this point, I think I can add a little personal opinion. In my opinion, big institutions will be a little conservative in terms of risk appetite, so big institutions tend to invest in popular stars, but not necessarily those disruptive projects. Therefore, for us ordinary investors, we can refer to projects invested by large institutions when we first get started. But if you want to create your own achievements and get better returns, you still need to learn more in the process, exercise your judgment ability, and strive to find subversive projects.

Now there seems to be a new trend in the circle - more and more projects are beginning to choose "fair offering" - so that all investors have the opportunity to participate in investment at the same price instead of allowing large institutions to enjoy low prices Privileges of fundraising. I even think that such projects are more likely to have star projects in the future, and the ability to grasp such projects depends not on the endorsement of institutions but on the judgment of investors.

In the process of private communication with this senior investor after the meeting, she mentioned that many well-known projects are now in the early stage of fundraising, and her team participated in the investment.

When she talked about some early investment experience, I found that many of the projects she invested in were not optimistic about many investors when they raised funds in the early stage, so the fundraising of the project side was very bleak, and the price was very low, so her The team can win a lot of shares at a very low price in order to have today's rich returns.

But if the timeline is really pulled back to that year, the same opportunity is in front of our ordinary investors, how many investors will think it is an "opportunity" rather than a "pit"? Because many investors who also saw those opportunities back then let go of those opportunities in vain.

Isn't the SuperRare case I shared in the article the day before yesterday another typical one?

I believe such cases will happen again in the future. So I think whether or not we can grasp opportunities in this field is largely related to personal cognition and judgment, because it is very likely that opportunities are in front of us, but we don’t see them as opportunities and think they are opportunities. It is a "pit".