Risk Warning: Beware of illegal fundraising in the name of 'virtual currency' and 'blockchain'. — Five departments including the Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission
Information
Discover
Search
Login
简中
繁中
English
日本語
한국어
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
BTC
ETH
HTX
SOL
BNB
View Market
A review of the entire story of the theft of 17,400 ETH from Munchables
南枳
Odaily资深作者
2024-03-27 07:40
This article is about 1404 words, reading the full article takes about 3 minutes
North Korean hackers lurked in as core developers and stole huge sums of money, but quickly "found their conscience" and returned the full amount...

Original - Odaily

Author - Nan Zhi

Munchables suffers insider attack

At 5 a.m. today, Blast ecological project Munchables posted an article on the X platform stating that itunder attack. According to Paidun, there was a suspected problem with the Munchables locking contract, resulting in the theft of 17,400 ETH (worth approximately $62.3 million).

Munchables is one of the Blast BIG BANG competition champion projects. It is a chain game project based on NFT pledge. In the early stages of the development of the protocol, users can mint NFT for free by staking 1 ETH or equivalent tokens, locking the NFT for 30 days, with additional incentives to encourage users to lock for longer. Pledged assets can obtain a series of rights and interests such as Blast points + gold points + protocol governance tokens. For example, NFT whale dingaling once announced that it was in the agreement150 ETH pledged

At present, the project has completed a Pre-Seed round of financing, with Manifold and Mechanism Capital co-leading the investment. The financing amount has not yet been disclosed.

North Korean hackers appear again

After the attack last night, chain security detective ZachXBT was the first to speak out and pointed out that the attack was related toNorth Korean developers related, and published itsCV

This morning, Slow Mist Cosine reported on the X platform regarding the attack on Munchables.Post a message to express: Munchables, the protocol on Blast, was stolen for $62.5 million. The loss is really huge. According to the investigation by on-chain detective ZachXBT, it is because one of their developers is a North Korean hacker... This is at least the second case we have encountered. DeFi projects have encountered this kind of situation.The core developers have been lurking in disguise for a long time and gained the trust of the entire team., I took action as soon as the opportunity came...

Since then, CoderDan, the founder of Aavegotchi, launched the X platformPost a message to express: “Aavegotchi’s development team, Pixelcraft Studios, isMunchables attackers were briefly hired in 2022 to do some game development work, his technique is very rough,Really feels like a North Korean hacker, we fired him within a month. He also tried to get us to hire a friend of his, who was probably also a hacker. CoderDan added that Pixelcraft Studios had some video calls with him at the time, but they were not recorded. It is not certain whether Google records all video calls internally.But the hacker did show up

Finally, CoderDan provided the Munchables team with the hackers common address when he worked at Pixelcraft Studios, hoping to use these clues to help Munchables recover the funds.

As of now, there is no particularly direct evidence to prove the true identity of the hacker, but multiple testimonies have revealed the North Korean hacker behind this incident.

Why do security incidents occur?

According to on-chain analyst @SomaXBTDisclosure, Blast ecosystem stolen project Munchables previously hired an unknown security team EntersoftTeam to issue an audit report in order to save audit costs. The team’s account profile reads “We are an award-winning application security company with certified white hat hackers,” but the platform only has a few hundred followers.

Latest news, analyzed by ZachXBT,Four different developers hired by the Munchables team could all be the same person, they recommended each other to do this job, and regularly transferred funds to the same two exchange deposit addresses, and also recharged each others wallets.

The attacker has a sudden conscience?

At 14:00 p.m., according to the on-chain data analysis platformScopescan monitoring, the Munchables attacker returned all 17,000 ETH to a multi-signature wallet 0x 4 D 2 F. At that time, it was not sure whether it was a refund for the attacker or a transfer address.

Half an hour later, Blast founder Pacman announced on the Currently worth $96 million). gratefulFormer Munchables developer chooses to eventually return all funds without any ransom. Munchables also retweeted the announcement saying: All user funds are safe, no locks will be enforced, and all Blast-related rewards will be distributed. Updates will be made in the coming days.

At the same time, Juice, which was previously affected by the Munchables attack, also announced the safety of its funds. All its wETH has been retrieved from the Munchables developers. Juice is coordinating with Pacman and Blast to transfer wETH back to Juice so that users can withdraw funds.

We don’t know the story behind why the attacker suddenly found out about the refund. Last night, he conducted a cross-chain coin laundering through the third-party cross-chain bridge Orbiter, but the amount was only 3 ETH. It takes 14 days to transfer through the official cross-chain bridge, and the third-party cross-chain bridge has insufficient liquidity, which may ultimately make it difficult to effectively transfer funds, which contributed to its negotiation for refunds.

in conclusion

In the past, when new chains were initially launched, due to mixed teams and incomplete infrastructure, it was not uncommon for projects to run away with money or be attacked by hackers. In the early days, there were also incidents of lack of supervision and theft of members by early teams. We cannot count on it every time. The attacker transformed into a white hat conscience discovery and refunded money, recommending investors to DYOR and strictly control the allocation of investment positions.


Safety
ETH
Cross-chain
NFT
Welcome to Join Odaily Official Community