Original author: Luojia Microcosm

The Celestia (TIA) airdrop was officially released on October 31. Many users on the chain had TIA token airdrops, and some of them received airdrops to multiple wallet addresses of one person. How to aggregate TIA tokens from multiple addresses without being judged as a witch account? Can multi-address recharge effectively circumvent the project’s anti-witch determination? Which exchange’s multi-address recharge function is better? This article will explain in detail the advantages and usage of multi-address recharge, and teach you how to correctly perform airdrops.

1. The inconvenience of current airdrops

The so-called witch account refers to the behavior of one person controlling multiple addresses on the chain and pretending to be different users to interact. For the project side, the witch’s behavior actually undermined the decentralization process of the project. Therefore, during the airdrop distribution process, the project team may actively screen witches, or the community may report them, thereby canceling their airdrop qualifications.

In order to obtain more airdrop qualifications, a user usually uses one address to frequently send/collect assets to multiple addresses. Such on-chain behavior can easily be judged as a witch account, thus losing the qualifications for airdrops. .

2. Advantages of multi-address recharge

The most important thing to prevent the project side from witch determination is to conduct address isolation.To put it simply, do not distribute/collect funds on the chain, but use the exchange to generate multiple different addresses for collection to avoid this problem.

Therefore, the multi-address recharge application was born.Its biggest advantage is that it can generate different addresses to distribute/collect funds to avoid being judged as a witch account by the project party.In addition, multi-address recharge has higher security and privacy. Each account (including sub-accounts) can add multiple independent recharge addresses. Each recharge provides multiple addresses for users to choose from, which makes users transactions difficult to track, thus improving the level of privacy protection.

3. Comparison of multi-address recharge functions of various exchanges

Currently, many mainstream centralized trading platforms have launched multi-address recharge functions, including Binance, Bitget and OKX. The following is a comparison of the multi-address recharge functions of various exchanges.

The multi-address recharge functions of these three exchanges are similar. In comparison, a single Bitget account supports a larger number of addresses. One account can generate 50 separate addresses, which is more convenient to use and does not require switching back and forth between multiple sub-accounts. In terms of the number of supported public chains, Bitget and OKX also have more, giving users a wider range of choices. Therefore, if you have higher requirements on the number of addresses and supported public chains, it is recommended to choose Bitget and OKX.

In addition, the importance of anti-witches is: do not choose the same amount to transfer or withdraw coins, but random amounts and random times; do not use multiple accounts to interact on the chain with the same path at the same time. For example, multiple accounts perform the same transactions in the same order within a day. Several DeFi interactions. By doing the above, you can avoid being judged as a witch, and the probability of getting airdrops will also be greatly increased.