Risk Warning: Beware of illegal fundraising in the name of 'virtual currency' and 'blockchain'. — Five departments including the Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission
Information
Discover
Search
Login
简中
繁中
English
日本語
한국어
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
BTC
ETH
HTX
SOL
BNB
View Market
Talking about the market effect brought by token unlocking: taking AXS, SAND, DYDX as examples
火星财经
特邀专栏作者
2023-02-01 13:00
This article is about 847 words, reading the full article takes about 2 minutes
This article examines market behavior before, during, and after large token unlocks to understand how investors react to the large supply.

Original title: "Token Unlocks aren't all cut from the same cloth"

Original Compilation: Kate, Marsbit

Original Compilation: Kate, Marsbit

Note: This article is from @ConorRyder Twitter, and MarsBit organizes it as follows:

Token unlocking is not exactly the same

Note that $AXS and $SAND are pumped before unlocking, outperforming $ETH by 50% and 45%

Unlocking is considered a bearish catalyst so I looked at the data to find out why some are more bearish than others

AXS

If token unlocking is bearish, what can we expect from prices like $AXS and $SAND after this rally?

Fortunately, both tokens were unlocked last year, so we can see how they perform on ETH

not too good

AXS

Transaction-level data reveals more interesting insights

Last year $AXS unlocked 8% of the capped supply, about a quarter of which went to early investors

Leads to selling pressure on the day of unlocking, which balances out a few days later

AXS

This is in stark contrast to the unlock on January 23rd, when only 1.8% of the supply was released

Importantly, none of this was allocated to early investors - it was all allocated to stakeholders

The difference is very large, there is a lot of buying than selling on the unlock day and after

AXS

Thus, a 25% allocation caused selling pressure on investors on unlock day, but balanced out afterwards

What about the 50%?

$SAND Unlocked in August Released 12% of Supply, Half of It Goes to Investors

Leading to intense selling pressure that lasted for several days

AXS

Now $SAND faces it all again on Feb 14th, 12% of supply was released, half of which went to investors

Strong selling pressure is expected, especially after the token’s recent rally

AXS

If that's not enough to prove that a 50% allocation to investors is a recipe for disaster, here's another example:

Last November, $IMX released 18% of the total supply, 50% of which went to investors

Also, in the days after unlocking, a large number of sell orders again exceeded buy orders

AXS

Now it's $DYDX, which is delaying unlocking until December

This will be a huge unlock, with 15% of the total supply being released and, you guessed it, half going to investors.

Once the news broke, shares jumped 20% and open interest increased by 50%

AXS

After looking at the liquidity data of CEX, I am sure $DYDX will see huge volatility

It has a lower depth than $AXS and $SAND, which means fewer orders are needed for price changes

Since 50% went to investors and there is very little liquidity, the dydx team may know that Token will be affected

AXS

So, what about $AXS, $DYDX, $SAND and other unlocks?

- Few investor unlocks in $AXS so the rally may have support

- $SAND has a huge 50% unlocked for investors

- $DYDX has no short-term headwinds, probably planning a v4 release in December to overwhelm unlocking

All in all, I would say that for investors, the unlocking needs to focus on: if ~50%, expect heavy selling pressure

Shout out to @Token_Unlocks and @UnlocksCalendar for unlocking this research

Original link

AXS

Token Unlocks: Not All Built The Same

Original link

Axie Infinity
dYdX
The Sandbox
Welcome to Join Odaily Official Community