Odaily News Paradigm GP Dan Robinson posted on the X platform that Paradigm is excited about many components of Blast, but also believes that some of the previous announcements made by Blast are suspected of crossing the line in terms of information transmission and execution. For example, Paradigm does not agree with the decision to launch Bridge before Layer 2 goes online, nor does it agree with the design of not allowing withdrawals within three months, because this sets a very bad precedent for other projects and is excessive marketing. It also damages the serious image of the team. Robinson added that Paradigm supports Pacman (founder of Blur and Blast) and other co-founders because they have demonstrated the ability to build great products over the years, so when Pacman told Paradigm his vision for Layer 2, we invested in him again . Paradigm has been discussing these concerns with the Blast team and appreciates their willingness to communicate, but there are still many differences between the two parties. Paradigm invests in strong and independent founders, and the views of both parties will not always be the same. However, Paradigm understands that the market may hope that Paradigm can set an example in the industry, so Paradigm would like to clarify that the organization does not approve of such strategies and will take Paradigms responsibilities in the ecosystem seriously. According to previous news, Pacman, founder of Blur and Blast, posted on the Get involved. Frankly, if they were involved, they would probably ask me to change a lot of aspects of the Blast launch. Paradigm are a powerhouse in the research space. They helped invent Uniswap and Blend, and have created Foundry and other tools to further advance Ethereum development. We consult with Paradigm on the technical side of the L2 design (which will go live in February) - they are very good at that. We do not consult with Paradigm on GTM - we bring it in-house. In fact, Paradigm I was asked to make changes to the GTM program following its launch. We are actively considering their suggestions. However, like any respectful investor, while they may disagree with a particular program and provide their own recommendations, they allow the businesses they work with They make the final decision. This is one of the many reasons I love working with their team.”